• uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Due to its mode of operation, the court considered the software to be “specifically intended for criminals”

    Crime is an action a state doesn’t like, not necessarily wrong or evil, but serves interests other than the state. If the state has to authorize everything, then the state is favoring dominance over governance.

    When the state has to monitor all transactions it is tyranny.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The state is just the abstraction of the collective will of the governed, if the Dutch people have determined this is a crime against their society, then it is.

      The state holds a monopoly on violence, another monopoly isn’t a stretch.

      • bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Collective will is just the myth that is used to legitimize the state

        The state is also so much more than the will of the governed. To say that it is all there is to it would consider governments like those governed by the divine right of kings fo be stateless. Stalin’s Russia, or Kim Jong Un’s DPRK would then be stateless.

  • Metz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    the court accused him of an “ideology of maximum privacy.”

    In what twisted fucked up crazy world is that a bad thing?

    I hate this timeline…

    • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      By this logic every locksmith should be put on trial for making locks, every manufacturer of vaults and safes, every lumber company for making wood used in fences, every costume designer for making halloween masks, every post office for renting PO boxes… etc.