Conservative activists, led by a local pastor and outspoken Israel advocate, pushed the district, Mission CISD, to excise books mostly about gender, sexuality and race. Their demands represented an extreme version of a nationwide culture war over books that has played out in recent years — and ensnared a number of books with Jewish themes.

In Mission, the long list of books on the chopping block includes a recent illustrated adaptation of Anne Frank’s diary; both volumes of Art Spiegelman’s Holocaust graphic memoir “Maus”; “The Fixer,” Bernard Malamud’s novel about a historical instance of antisemitic blood libel; and “Kasher in the Rye,” a ribald memoir by Jewish comedian Moshe Kasher.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s very difficult to avoid comparing right wing America to fascists when they have this much of a problem with Maus.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wouldn’t want people learning from history, now would we? How else are we supposed to repeat it?

  • Neps@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I swear this shithole takes every chance it can get at doing some of the most stupid shit ever its insane.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, but the New Testament says everyone who doesn’t worship Jesus is going to burn in hell forever, so that kind of lessens the whole Jewishness of the first half.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      i cannot believe how openly anti-nazi some books are! we should burn these intolerant books!

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        We have these people who go to college and get specialized degrees so that they can do things and work in school libraries and figure out what books are appropriate for the school.

        You might have heard of them. They’re called librarians.

        Deciding what books do and don’t belong in a library is literally part of their job. I know, because I’m married to one. She used to work in a school library, now she works in a public library. It was a Catholic school (she’s an atheist, they didn’t discriminate) and they trusted her to figure out which books were appropriate for their kids because of her degree. What does that tell you about librarians?

        • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          It tells me that they are obviously evil because they don’t blindly support a white Christian authoritarian regime.

          /s

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        We had like everything, from childrens books to engineering stuff. It’s filed differently so your fragile mind won’t need to see “adult” books if you don’t want to I guess.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          My fragile mind doesnt want minors to see things they shouldnt see till later. That should be a pretty obvious thing that everyone wants for children…

          • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Get rid of anything that mentions rape, prostitution, genocide, or god forbid SODOMY?

            Out goes the bible then. No one under 18 should read it.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              The difference between the Bible and other more modern books is that the Bible is the most influential book in western civilization. If you want to have a censored on that removed those exact passages then that seems like a reasonable compromise.

              • maniclucky@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Fuck that, the wretched thing doesn’t deserve special treatment. There is nothing about the contents of the bible that are worth granting exception for. You want to ban adult themes? I can think of nothing more deserving of such a ban than the oldest book to incorporate rape, divinely ordained murder (all over the place), instructions on how to perform an abortion, incest, and the severly mixed message of “god loves everyone, unless you don’t worship them, then you get tortured forever”.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Like it or not the Bible is the most influence book in western history, so yes it gets special treatment. But again, if you want to make a censored version for kids that takes out those parts, it seems like a reasonable compromise.

          • Jank@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            I like how this argument assumes schools are just regularly stocking school libraries with your Literotica history.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              I didnt say they were. If its not happening very often why are you guys so against books being removed?

              • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                If it’s not happening often, why are you hellbent on banning books? They are edge case, but your ilk act like every school library is chuck full of inappropriate books.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I am hellbent on protecting children from adults that will do them harm. If its only edge cases then why are you hellbent on putting rules in place to remove questionable books?

      • Xanis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Which books do you believe shouldn’t be provided in a classroom setting?

        No copouts. I don’t think anyone expects a bunch of 3rd graders to have a discussion on 50 Shades of Grey.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think the opinion as to what shouldnt be in public schools is reasonable, and I am cool if we are overly restrictive if there is a reason that is good and is supported by enough people.

          • Xanis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            You didn’t answer my question. Let’s try a different one. Once again without copping out: Give us a couple good reasons for why a book should be restricted in education.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Books should be restricted from education if a significant portion of the adults dont think its appropriate for children. This could include any variety of reasons they dont think its appropriate.

              • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Will each book be voted on individually? How does that work in your head? I doubt that people read minimally an excerpt of each book to decide and ban them.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Probably do it on a complaint basis. Each school district could have a diverse board and they could look at the books that people dont like and if X out of Y think it should be removed, then remove it. Does that work for you?

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        All books ever!!! The Necromomicon! Solomon’s Demonology! THE ANARCHIST’S NOTEBOOK!! PEPPA PIG GOES TO HELL!! !

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        It isn’t about them being available. Its about discussing the content and the deeper meaning. I would be totally fine with reading Adolf Hitlers - Mein Kampf in School, as long as the content gets discussed and why what he wrote wasn’t good.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Nothing is going to be discusses it would just be sitting on the shelf and available. So I think we should all agree that censorship of books in public schools makes sense. I personally am fine with siding on the side of being more cautious and having kids less able to get books people think are not acceptable, and catching books that probably should be available in schools.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            If kids are only exposed to kid friendly stuff, then they will never learn anything and stay kids long into adulthood.

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Censoring books due to reasons like “these books provide a point of view I’m not comfortable exposing my kids too” is usually a bad reason to censor books.

            Problem I see is its all a pendulum on these issues where the reaction swings wildly back and forth the more energy were putting into it rather than having it settle the fuck down.

            For instance these books being removed aren’t produced in spite of this issue. But for sure if we dig into censorship topic then pro censorship groups start bringing out books to be edgy cunts and prove a point.

            Every issue has edge cases and we live in a time where people are so willing to be right they will make every edge case the center of an issue. Like in order to keep Maus on shelves we will now need to have a copy of Bomb making 101 or a book were one of these people wrote FUCK a million times just so they can get anti censorship people to say “hey that isn’t cool guys”

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              What you are saying makes sense, I just dont see an issue if XX% of people dont want a book to be in PUBLIC schools, then I am okay with restricting it unless there is some kind of cultural significance, and within reason. I am probably okay with Maus from what I have heard, but I dont see it as an issue to take it off the shelf if people feel strongly and there is some level of logic.

          • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            You do realise that there’s a version of Mien Kampf that’s four times as long because there’s several experts annotating and debunking Hitler’s ideas right there on the page.

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Thats fine, what would be so bad if a signficant part of the population dont think its appropriate so its not provided to kids at a public school?

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                A significant part of the population doesn’t think it’s appropriate for a picture book about two male penguins that adopt a chick to be in a public school.

                In fact, a significant part of the population doesn’t think white kids and black kids should go to the same school. And have found ways to do things about it.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segregation_academy

                Why should we cater to these significant parts of the population?

              • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                History is uncomfortable. Revising it to tell lovely stories is all well and good for building a national identity.

                However, sugar-coating, ignoring, or even flat-out erasing parts of history benefits no one. People started writing events down accurately because the orators of old never intended paint an accurate picture of the past. And therefore lessons learnt from the failures of humanity (lost causes, preventable catastrophies, perspectives of people on the wrong side, genocides, etc.) were also lost.

                History should be uncomfortable, so we can collectively learn and have a chance to do better the next time.

              • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                What would be so bad with…

                …checks notes…

                …informing young people about the most horrible decisions made throughout history, why they were flawed, and how not to repeat the same mistakes today?

                Hmm…

                Just take a look at the world around you. That’s a fucking start…

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    well the USA was circling the drain after Trump’s first win… they are now at the toilet gargling stage

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      This isn’t the USA. It’s one school district in one state. I know you aren’t bright enough to separate the two, but it would be like saying because the far right has made inroads in French election, then all of Europe is in the toilet.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you read the article you’ll find that this is a nation wide movement, they are all copying ban lists from Booklook, a website that used to be a Mom’s for Liberty site. Which is why these clowns keep blindly removing books that make them look like anti-semetic racist idiots. They are those things, but one would guess they’d be a little subtle, also most school districts don’t allow blanket book banning, you have to find the book in their libraries and have a formal meeting about removing it. A lot of these books aren’t even in school libraries.

        But my point is. It’s not one school district in one state it’s happening all over.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          There are people all over the globe who want to ban books, I’m sure there is plenty of trying. The fact that they haven’t been successful across the country, but won in this one podunk district in a very conservative state, kind of reflects well on the US as a whole, no?

          • Snowclone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s not just one place. I feel like you already understand this but you just need to argue a point for dumb reasons. It’s not one place, it’s a clear, obvious, nation wide effort with central organization. Why would you think that isn’t significant OTHER than arguing a point for no reason beyond your ego?

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        This isn’t the USA.

        Texas is, believe it or not, the USA. Since 1845 even.

        I know you aren’t bright enough to separate the two

        Big words from a pathetic person.

        it would be like saying because the far right has made inroads in French election, then all of Europe is in the toilet.

        Imagine existing in 2024 and not yet noticing the global trend towards Fascism in a world with increasing economic unfairness that’s about to experience a worldwide climate disaster that will displace a billion people, handing a massive opportunity to the far right to take control.

        But no, the right wing is no big deal. Just ignore what’s happening in Texas and France (and everywhere else), it’s not important.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Texas is, believe it or not, the USA. Since 1845 even.

          No, Texas is part of the USA. It is not the USA. You even responded to the part about how I discussed parts of Europe…and you still fucked this up. Amazing.

          But no, the right wing is no big deal.

          Who said it wasn’t a big deal? I’m all for calling this out, but using this one school district doing something dumb to claim the entirety of the USA is garbage is…well, completely fucking moronic.

          • Snowclone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s not one school district is a nationwide effort, you’re minimizing it either through ignorance or malice.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m sure there is some effort in every corner of the globe to have some books banned. You’re minimizing it either through ignorance or malice.

              • Snowclone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Next time just say ‘‘No U’’, all this is doing is convincing me you don’t know what these words mean.

      • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Conservatives continue winning elections. Trump, of all people, actually became president. He has a non zero chance of being voted in again. Supreme Court is far right conservative. House of reps is republican controlled. Many Democrat elected officials are arguably, conservative.

        This is the USA. This is who the conservatives are, and they win often.

        Until the people show us by continually electing democrats to take the senate, house, and exec branch over and over and over again (not gonna happen), this type of shit is VERY USA.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          You propose legitimate criticisms of the us as a whole. I was responding to the claim that this one school district being dumb is what makes the whole us dumb. It’s terrible logic, and I think you understand that, which is why you didn’t attempt to defend their argument, but pulled in tons of other points to justify their conclusion.