• Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    “I’m wondering if there’s some point- if you’ve identified some point where you will stop, where the administration will stop, where the federal government will stop this requirement and let the market decide…"

    Let the market decide? Sure let’s do that. As of now, let’s have the U.S. government stop subsidizing the oil industry to the tune of $20 billion+ per year and see who keeps buying gas powered cars when gas is $15-20 per gallon. Better still, pour that $20 billion into EV car development and green energy and help save the fucking planet.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      For future readers, the quote in this comment is from GOP Representative Perry who was then immediately proven wrong by Buttigieg.

    • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      EVs can’t save the environment. EVs are made from oil (tires, plastics), and the metals they are made from are extracted and shipped using huge machines also made from and burning oil.

      Switching from pumping oil to mining Lithium isn’t a net improvement to the environment.

      Any mode of transportation that is heavy and uses tires is going to be a major source of microplastics.

      It is not possible to expand into sustainability when it’s our massive scale that is at the core of our unsustainability. Degrowth is our only chance.

      • guacupado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Switching from pumping oil to mining Lithium isn’t a net improvement to the environment.

        We did both before EVs were a thing.

        • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Rail as part of degrowth is a great idea. Rail as part of expanded exploitation of natural resources is not.

      • kevindqc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’ll take the lesser evil of local pollution over sending billions of tons of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere every year.

        I doubt degrowth will ever happen unless it’s caused by population collapse due to mass casualties.

        • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          8 billion is unsustainable, our population will decrease drastically in the coming century. We can choose whether it’s via degrowth (a controlled, intentional, intelligent reversal of the economic growth of the last decades) or famine, disease, and war.

          I fear you’re right that degrowth will never happen and we’re just going to march toward collapse.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think education alone curbs population growth towards negatives, and that policies can easily decrease population growth far into the negative, as many modern nations have illustrated. Mass casualties aren’t realistic or necessary.

        • force@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Do NOT use battery electric busses when you could use trolleybusses. Or even better, just use trams

          That being said, anything is better than diesel busses

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    All of these hearings serve no purpose other than to give Congress people 4 minutes of time to create some sound bites for the campaign.

    Questions are widely leading or very inaccurate or even just lies … If they ask a question at all. Some just spout garbage for a few minutes.

    • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not always. Both Trump’s NY fraud conviction, and election interference (hush money) felonies came out of the Michael Cohen hearing, specifically from AOC questions.

      Your overall point is absolutely correct, though. It’s even more frustrating when it’s easy to see how powerful these hearings can be.

        • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I wouldn’t say so. She asked direct, pointed questions about how the Trump org had over valued properties and other assets in order to get more favorable loans. She knew exactly what she was doing during that hearing.

  • ozoned@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    A lot of GOP voters don’t really care about facts sadly. I’ve talked to some that insist Jan 6th wasn’t an issue.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      A lot? Pretty much all of them. Look at how many lies trump said during the debate… they’ll lie directly to their base and their base isn’t even intelligent enough to question it.

      • EveryoneDiesAlone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Whitmer or whitehouse woukd be better, but the way the DNC plays things, they would obviously choose the weakest candidate for no reason other than to not seem biased against their opposition. It’s fucked. The whole thing is fucked.

        • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          No. It’s because they are getting paid by the same people to seem like they care. They don’t and I am not saying both parties are the same I’m saying the same entity controls both party’s coffers. The oligarchs.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think it’s a bit more nuanced than that. They’ll obviously choose the most neoliberal candidate they think they can get away with, and try to pass him (and it will be “him”) off as “progressive”

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            If only there was some kind of formal method for identifying and vetting and selecting the party representatives, as part of - like - an election or something. I feel like if maybe we’d started back in January and had a bunch of debates between these people early on, we might be able to include ourselves in the discussion.

            Instead, I guess we’re just going to wishcast our favorite blue state governor into the White House, until the DNC Convension disabuses us of our delusions.

      • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        That is probably the only dirtbag Democrat that could sway my vote from them to the Green party. Fuck Gavin Nuisance with a long rusty shovel.

        • EveryoneDiesAlone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Are you under the impression that the green party is a reliable place to put your vote? Do you believe that this is not a complete waste of your one singular vote?

          • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It’s not a waste if you vote. It’s a waste if you don’t vote. Screw your head back on.

          • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Stop trying to shame people who want to vote differently from you. It’s not an effective way to change someone’s mind and it’s anti-democratic.

            • Ledivin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Our voting system is undemocratic. Until that isn’t the case, I will keep trying to push people away from wasting their votes.

        • paf0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I will vote for whatever candidate has the best chance of beating Donald Trump.

  • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I just wish Mr. Buttigieg wasn’t confined to such a low-stakes role in the administration. It’s great that he gets the occasional moments like this, but he’s not exactly being set up for a run at the Presidency in 2028.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I just wish Mr. Buttigieg wasn’t confined to such a low-stakes role in the administration.

      Mr. Buttigieg is just a small bean from Indiana. If we want real leadership, we need to look to a more successful set of mayoral candidates. Like Michael Bloomberg or Lori Lightfoot.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I dunno if I’d consider Secratary of Transportation as a low stakes role, he’s been out and about getting IIJA funds out across the country and there to present new rail, highway, air and marine infrastructure improvements.

      Plus, if an unspeakable fate were to befall thirteen specific individuals, simultaneously rendering them unable to perform their duties, you’d have a President Buttigieg.

    • The Assman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Dude’s only 42. He’s got plenty of time. Hell you can’t even get elected these days if you aren’t getting social security.

  • djsoren19@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Good. This is the kinda shit Dems should keep doing. It doesn’t matter if it sounds petty, these assholes are a threat to our democracy, they should not be allowed to spew their lies without consequences. If the press refuses to do their job, it falls to whoever is closest to a Republican.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I accept my anger and cynicism; I forgive myself for letting these people anger me. I try to “turn the other cheek” and simply be a better person than them. But…

    …the more i hear these people talk, the more I’d love to see something excruciatingly painful to happen to them.