You must log in or register to comment.
Alright this is like the third time I’ve seen a Whizzbanger in as many days. Who taught y’all about this? This is supposed to be cursed knowledge.
Hyper made an animation of one recently: https://youtu.be/j90nZ1-K-zQ
this is how people used guns before john browning was born
No barrel means no rifling marks makes the shot untraceable. *taps temple*
No barrel means no compression means bullet no move very fast
Sub sonic ammunition? Holy hell man that shit’s basically silent. Tactile as fuck
Oh I guess gunpowder is silent now 😆
There’s a suppressed sub-sonic smg that you can shoot without earprotection and people say you wouldn’t hear it over the wind rustling in the bushes.
Nevermind the brass shrapnel, I think her Red Dot is on backwards…how will she ever aim?!
Wait, y’all are aiming? I just let er rip. Jesus take the wheel
Anime artists are unfamiliar with firearms?
Inconceivable.
Yes, because this is a completey serious attempt otherwise
Relevant https://youtu.be/j90nZ1-K-zQ
I hope the hammer has a trigger on the handle, too.
hammer is trigger
You gotta pull the trigger on the hammer while you’re swinging it or it doesn’t count
No barrel makes the whole round detonate. The bullet is ineffective, the “gun” explode :(
Given that the thing was created on a meme of “what if programing languages were guns?” to represent the C language, I guess it’s pretty much correct.
Needed to google that and was not disappointed:
No, it won’t.
You’re clearly uninformed on the power of Operator Prayer, or Tactical Theology, and the role it plays on the modern battlefield.
With sufficient levels of belief, that bullet can achieve anything. Just remember, if you believe, your bullet can achieve.
Just because you’re not wrong doesn’t mean you’re right. “Spray and pray” is the lowest form of divine intervention. - Laws of Murphy, 69:420
Alternatively, the shell has nothing to hang on to it properly so it goes flinging out, deforms, and then pegs her in the face.
Wait, is that true? I mean it clearly would be significantly less effective, but would it really not have enough propulsion to go vaguely forward with enough force to penetrate into a body?
How a gun “works” is that a thick-walled chamber houses the cartridge, so that as the powder ignited within rapidly expands (deflagration) there is nowhere for it to go besides violently propelling the projectile into the barrel. If there is no chamber, the thin walls of the cartidge are the path of least resistence, and the bullet likely stays put as the gases escape from cracks in the casing.
So no, while this wouldn’t be “safe” (eye damage comes to mind), there would not be enough energy to significantly wound a human by striking a round’s primer without a chamber.
The bullet is heavy. The pressure wants out it’s easier to breach a little bit of brass than to move a heavy bullet. The greatest risk here is the fragmentation of the brass casing.
Nope, not even close. The edge of the casing is the weak point, the explosive energy would breach all around there first and the bullet would just kinda plop forward a bit.
Mom, they’re taking NCD shit seriously again! Tell them to stop!
