• just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    If you’re more worried about your kid at school getting shot than them getting distracted during their education, You might be the one living in a shit hole country.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I believe in educating kids to know how to ignore distractions. The phone will be there in every work/life situation and will be a tool used to get them further in their careers and life in general. It’s stupid to let them use them openly during class… It’s also stupid to make legislation about them. Notice we don’t have country wide dress codes for schools. Just legislation that says when such codes have gone to far. Banning students from having items they carry daily is just a stupid over abuse of power being instated for what reason? Failed parenting and failed educators?

      You text during class you get told to stop, happens again you get detention/thrown out of class/sent to the dean and eventually thrown out of the school. Always was that way. No need for laws around it.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        You text during class you get told to stop, happens again you get detention/thrown out of class/sent to the dean and eventually thrown out of the school. Always was that way. No need for laws around it.

        It’s more complicated. Teachers can’t take away the phone because it’s an expensive piece of property and it opens all kinds of doors for the school being liable if it goes missing or gets broken. Not to mention if something does happen, the parents might sue the school.

        And we aren’t talking about mere distractions, but things designed to keep kids addicted to them. You’re pitting school teachers and admins trying to get kids to pay attention to something often found as boring, against billion dollar businesses pushing punping money into keeping and grabbing kid’s attention. Plus having kids miss school because of a cell phone just doesn’t make sense, especially if the parents are pushing the kid to bring it.

        The law just makes it clear and reduces liability for the school, and it’s better for kids.

        I wish the world were the way our describe it, and that would work. But it doesn’t.

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Teachers can’t shouldn’t take away the phone because it’s an expensive piece of property and … the school being is liable… Not to mention if something does happen, the parents might should sue the school. The law just makes it clear this legal and reduces liability for the school, and it’s better for as usual kids are told it’s better for them to be controlled and lack agency.

          FTFY.

          things designed to keep kids addicted to them

          You really think that’s what electronic engineers do?

        • dezmd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          You pretty obviously don’t know what you’re talking about, almost every class my children have been in for middle school and high school had the children commit to not using their smartphone and sent home a slip to be signed by parents acknowledging that the phones will be taken away and have to be picked up by a parent if they become a distraction for the student. They include similar language in the school student handbook as well.

          This law is just ridiculous authoritative nonsense, being used to score a victory for political marketing purposes.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            Agreements and enforcement are two different things. Have you talked to any teachers about how this plays out?

  • scottywh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I don’t understand how a state governor can “introduce” a bill.

    Isn’t that the legislature’s job?

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Anyone can introduce a bill, including you. Only the legislature’s vote on it counts.

  • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I’m 100% in favor of this move. If parents really need their kid to have a phone at school, get them a basic flip phone.

  • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    This so government overreach. Let the teachers and school admin decide. There no need to get the state government involved.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Good idea. Its of the main reason why education today is faltering. Allowing too many screen in the class room is simply a bad idea. These kids have the no ability to stay focused in any way. They way they learn guarantees many will never learn to read without a screen and the internet. I see it often in my current job.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “I have seen these addictive algorithms pull in young people, literally capture them and make them prisoners in a space where they are cut off from human connection, social interaction and normal classroom activity,” she said.

    The smartphone-ban bill will follow two others Hochul is pushing that outline measures to safeguard children’s privacy online and limit their access to certain features of social networks.

    In New York, the bills have faced pushback from big tech, trade groups and other companies, which collectively spent more than $800,000 between October and March lobbying against one or both of them, according to public disclosure records.

    This differs from other state-level bills across the country, which place some reliance on self-policing by tech companies to decide which features could be harmful by completing assessments of whether products are “reasonably likely” to be accessed by children.

    “Meta itself admits its own parental controls aren’t widely used – they’re often confusing and frequently fail to work as intended,” said Sacha Haworth, executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, a policy advocacy organization.

    The major social media firms have faced increasing scrutiny over harms against children, including sextortion scams, grooming by predators and worsening mental health.


    The original article contains 922 words, the summary contains 199 words. Saved 78%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    It’s dumb as fuck.

    Hate it if we want (and I have major problems with how young phones and similar devices become glued to kids), but they’re here to stay. They’re a part of modern life, and trying to completely ban them is the most idiotic waste of time and resources possible.

    You gotta find a way to limit use in a consistent and evenly applied way so that parents and school staff are all on the same page. Then you just keep enforcing the rules amd explaining them over and over. Eventually, it becomes a manageable annoyance instead of the chaos it currently is

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      so that parents and school staff are all on the same page.

      That’s the problem, they aren’t on the same page. Teachers and admins have to live in the reality of kids having these devices in school, while parents just live in the anxiety of the very rare “what if something happens?”

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    What a creep. Instead of making NYC safer for kids by reducing cars, she’s making school more of an authoritarian prison.

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Authoritarian prison? Calm down. All place have rules, schools are to learn, not to be on your phone all the time. We were without mobile phones for Millenia and now that they’re here you’re acting as if you can’t live without one.

      Yes, you can live without your mobile phone and if you think you can’t then this new law is exactly for you

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    they could have incorporated similar tech to teach children better. or we could figure out why class is so boring when the subjects can be so interesting.

    but nooo lets ban phones instead because we want things to stay like they were 40 years ago.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Great,I fully support this

    Schools should be places to learn, not to be distracted by continuous alerts from phone addicted children

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I fully support this as long as they put the pay phones back in the schools so kids can call their parents when they need to

      • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Why would even that be necessary? It’s school, not jail or drug den…

        Kids survived fine without phones for millenia, I’m sure they can survive now. If there is a real emergency, then I’m sure some supervisor can make a call…

      • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        A school shouldn’t make kids pay to call their legal guardian. Make phone calls free.

        • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          Either way, there should some way to do it without having to go to the main office and ask to use their phone or something. When I was a kid we had payphones, back when it cost a dime.

          • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’m sorry but just wondering here… Why would you need to phone home up to the point where you can’t be without a phone? I didn’t have phones in my school, never needed them either. A lot of people are acting as if not having phones will kill them where in reality, everyone will be just fine.

            • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              Like when my kid is finished with his club after school and it’s raining and he’d like me to pick him up. Or he’s at school and realizes he forgot to take his medication. One time his bike was broken and he couldn’t ride it.

              I’m glad for you that you never once had a need to call home. I congratulate you. Some people do need to, and I just hope they have a way.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    smartphones are a distraction in schools. The teachers shouldn’t have them either, tbh

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    A lot of public school districts now provide laptops or Chromebooks to the students to use during class while doing… let’s say…minimal oversight at best.

    So most of the same inappropriate garbage behaviors and distractions will just be offloaded from the personal phone to the school device.

  • HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    This sucks, because smartphones could be such fantastic tools in a classroom. Not that I’m under the illusion that they’re being used in any sort of productive way (or even would be), I was once a kid scrolling through shitposts and memes in class. But having all of the textbooks in one place, the ability to record lectures and whiteboards for later review, and automated schedule management would’ve definitely made my high school education a lot smoother.

    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yeah, and there are some analytical apps for smartphone cameras and sensors, like measuring physio with accel or gyro. But I guess that’s okay to include as a part of a course and not really needed for rest of the school day

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      When using the right tools, phones are already incredibly powerful in an educational environment. There’s a reason why Kahoot achieved meme status: it’s because students love it.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      The other side of the coin on this. Cell phones as day planners are invaluable. So kids who have spent their lives organizing their schedules on digital calendars are being told “Oops! Sorry. You can’t use that anymore. We caught someone else using it incorrectly.”

      Incidentally, I’m old enough to remember how every graphing calculator in the school had video games installed on them and half my class carried a gameboy someone on their persons. This is going to be pure wack-a-mole as a policy. Selectively enforced, with lots of high profile punishments for minor infractions and inevitably highly intrusive misconduct by individual teachers and principles. Richer, whiter students will almost certainly be exempted from the policy through loopholes. Poorer, blacker students will be shoved even more forcefully through the School To Prison Pipeline. Cops will inevitably get involved in the worst possible way.

      And all of this will be sold as a means of “reducing distractions”.