JOHANNESBURG — South Africa’s ruling African National Congress party has lost its outright majority for the first time in a devastating blow for the party once led by Nelson Mandela. The ANC has dominated South African politics since winning in the first post-apartheid elections 30 years ago.

The ANC was braced for a disappointing outcome, predicted by polls before Wednesday’s elections, but the final results are even more sobering. It won 40 percent of the vote, falling from 57% in 2019.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know pundits have been calling this for months now but its still pretty wild that it happened.

    Next up, Mexico’s first female president

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      “an historic” isn’t incorrect, neither is “a historic” it’s the same issue as “a European” - the a/an choice is based off of pronunciation which is inconsistent because languages diverge (especially english)… the dumb thing is that “an” is written instead of just being written as “a” and optionally pronounced as “an” when followed by a vowel it’d meld into.

      Anyways, both choices are valid. The only truly incorrect thing is that en-uk use “speeded” as the past tense of “speed” and that’s just fucking awful - we can all agree on that. /s

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        checks Google Ngrams

        According to Google Ngrams, in American English, “an historic” and “a historic” were about neck-and-neck until 1935, when “a historic” started steadily pulling ahead. Today, “a historic” is far more common.

        https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=a+historic%2Can+historic&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-US-2019&smoothing=3

        In British English, “an historic” had a solid lead for a long time, with “a historic” pulling ahead in 1986, and “a historic” now being significantly much more-common as well.

        https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=a+historic%2Can+historic&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-GB-2019&smoothing=3

        Anyways, both choices are valid. The only truly incorrect thing is that en-uk use “speeded” as the past tense of “speed” and that’s just fucking awful - we can all agree on that. /s

        The one that drives me nuts is “pressurized”. In American English, you “pressure” someone to do something, but “pressurize” something with gas. In British English, you “pressurize” both, which is ambiguous. I mean, given context, I can normally make it out, but it’s just ambiguity that doesn’t need to be there, and it always gives me the wrong mental image to start with.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          In British English, “an historic” had a solid lead for a long time, with “a historic” pulling ahead in 1986, and “a historic” now being significantly much more-common as well.

          Well that explains why my British father with a doctorate in English drilled using “an historic” into me.

  • cannibalkush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Now we’re all waiting with baited breath for some of these interminable assholes to actually form a coalition government 😕

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      baited breath

      “bated breath”

      https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/with_bated_breath

      From the verb bate, alteration by aphesis of the verb abate (“to reduce; lessen”). Coined by William Shakespeare in The Merchant of Venice, see quotations.

      with bated breath

      1. With reduced breath.

      2. (idiomatic) Eagerly; with great anticipation.

      We are waiting with bated breath for the release of the new version.