• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I still want to see someone slap an airplane grade INS suite into a car and load it up with some maps to see how far it can go without relying on GPS lol.

    Not that it would functionally change much, but I find it annoying only self driving cars are still using dedicated navigation setups.

    Google Maps has an aneurysm if you’re not going above 5mph even though the accelerometer really should have made this a non problem. Its even more dumb to be using your tiny phone receiver for vehicle navigation. GMaps still has to wait until you’re past a spot before finally deciding where you actually are.

  • CyberSeeker@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    So the article repeats, several times, “waymo relies on remote operators”. I don’t think the author knows what “self-driving” means.

    • Bell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And he forgets to mention the precise mapping required too. He also left out the terrible experiences Waymo has had with revoked permits, cars disabled by traffic cones, and multiple traffic stopping glitches where intersections were blocked for hours.

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah but the waymo ceo doesn’t shitpost on Twitter so people here don’t get front page hyped up stories every single time things aren’t perfect