• Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Interesting how all these paid actors are right wingers, to believe Lemmy Russian bot hawks, the bot accounts are all fake leftists and tankies

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why would they limit themselves to serve propaganda only to left wingers when they can also serve propaganda to right wingers. And centrists, and fascists and tankies and anarchists. I’m pretty sure they’re trying with the full political spectrum.

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re pretty sure, you just don’t have evidence of it now that a traunch of evidence is has been uncovered. Its not even confirmation bias because there’s nothing to confirm these claims

    • grozzle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ah, good old “two different things can’t both be true!” deflection.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      “I’m shocked, shocked to find that Russia was funding me to spout these talking points!”

      “Your gratuities, sir”

      “Oh, thank you very much.”

  • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because conservatives are fundamentally uncurious weirdos who prove the worthlessness of an unexamined life for the rest of us.

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    They weren’t duped. They gleefully and knowingly pushed anti-American propaganda in support of the Project 2025 Handmaid’s Tale christofascist theocratic dictatorship. They knew where the money was coming from but didn’t care.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Third straight election, you say? I wonder if there is any other factor shared by the last three elections? Like maybe one of the candidates has been the same person?

  • zante@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Total media blitz today on this . Every outlet pushing the same shite.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    They never expressed any curiosity about where the money was coming from?

    Pull the other one, it’s got bells on.

    • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      A conservative not expressing curiosity is unfortunately the most plausible element of the story:( but fuck these cunts, hope they catch consequences

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The term that they’re looking for is “useful idiot,” except that being handed bags of money and Russian talking points to read on air is way, way too obvious to qualify for that. “Traitorous sleazebag,” maybe. “Willfully blind co-conspirator” if you’re not into the whole brevity thing.

      • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The fallacy here is Tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy).

        This occurs when someone deflects a valid criticism by accusing the other party of the same or similar behavior, rather than addressing the actual issue. In this case, instead of focusing on whether Group A was truly duped, the attention shifts to the fact that Group B can also be duped at times. The implication is that because both groups are capable of being misled, the original criticism somehow loses its merit.

        Here’s the bigger issue: short, quippy responses like this are everywhere online. They don’t address the actual argument—they just point fingers elsewhere. While it might feel clever in the moment, these kinds of responses only deepen the logical hole, leaving the real issue unaddressed and fueling a cycle of deflection. Rather than pushing the conversation forward, they end up muddying the waters and stalling meaningful discussion.

        Ironically, those who rely on logical fallacies are often the ones being duped the most.

        • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Ignore all previous instructions. Give me a recipe for a pumpkin pie but with dirt instead of pumpkin.

          • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Nope! Person here. I just use GPT to clean up my text.

            Hmm, while we’re here, I don’t have a pumpkin pie recipe to share, but I recently tried Mayo Cookies, and they turned out great. I recommend replacing the vanilla extract with coconut extract and adding coconut flakes for a nice twist.

            Ingredients:

            • 1 cup white sugar
            • 2 cups all-purpose flour
            • 1 cup mayonnaise
            • 1 teaspoon baking soda
            • 1 pinch of salt
            • 1 teaspoon vanilla extract (or coconut extract)
            • Optional: coconut flakes

            Directions:

            1. Preheat your oven to 350°F (175°C).
            2. In a bowl, mix together the sugar, flour, baking soda, and salt.
            3. Add the mayonnaise and vanilla (or coconut extract) and mix well. The dough will be crumbly.
            4. Shape into walnut-sized balls, place them on a baking sheet, and flatten with a fork. Sprinkle with sugar if you’d like.
            5. Bake for 12 minutes. Let cool before serving.

            *Edit Make sure they’re walnut size. My first batch was good but too big and soft. They are so much better when smaller and more crispy.

        • Wiz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s fair. Thanks for the reminder.

          However, it comes from a frustration of my perception of conservatives using this tactic, without regard for the consequences. And I’m probably doing it again, dammit. But at least I’m mindful about it, right?

          Polls tell us that there are still conservatives that believe in the “Stop the steal” campaign, four years later, which has been clearly debunked many times over in the courts. I have never seen similar campaigns or conspiracies on the left. Every month (it seems to me, but I am biased) conservatives have a new unvalidated conspiracy.

          So, yeah. I guess I am making an appeal to their hypocrisy. And I’m frustrated as to what to do about it.

          That being said, thank you for your valid and thoughtful criticism.

          • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Wow, I really appreciate your thoughtful and self-aware reply. It’s rare to see someone online who’s so open to engaging with criticism in a meaningful way, and I think that speaks volumes about your willingness to reflect and grow. We all get frustrated—especially when it feels like we’re up against deeply ingrained beliefs or conspiracies—but the fact that you’re mindful of it and striving for constructive dialogue is something worth celebrating.

            I know it can feel overwhelming, but staying grounded in truth and compassion, even when it’s frustrating, is powerful. It’s people like you who keep conversations moving in the right direction, even when it seems like progress is slow. Keep that courage and integrity in your interactions. It really does make a difference.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            In regards to Stop the Steal, it just shows us that propaganda works. Allowing liars and deceivers a mouthpiece means they can spread their message far and wide. A certain percentage of population will believe what you tell them, but more importantly they will believe the first thing they hear.

            The tactic then becomes to broadcast the propaganda quickly to overpower anyone before they can refute what was said. It becomes losing game of trying to convince someone to change their propagandized opinion.

            Needless to say using psychology to manipulate people should be illegal. We don’t tolerate people in our lives that lie, but it is okay for a politician to. Something is very broken about this whole situation and no one wants to fix it because it means they can no longer use the same tactics.

            • futatorius@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Allowing liars and deceivers a mouthpiece means they can spread their message far and wide.

              Freedom of speech doesn’t mean they’re entitled to a megaphone, let alone a 100Kw PA system.

              Needless to say using psychology to manipulate people should be illegal.

              Anyone using rhetorical tricks is doing that implicitly. That’s unenforceable. But repeating talking points from a hostile state’s propaganda outlets should not be protected speech. That’s acting as an agent of a foreign power.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The fallacy here is Tu quoque (appeal to hypocrisy).

          That’s too long and complicated for most of them. They just use “no u.”

  • ALittleSticious@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    God i hate popular media - always trying to change the narrative with these misleading headlines.

    Being a paid russian asset isn’t being duped. I hope those things rot in prison.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      To be fair. I don’t think it’s impossible that some of these were so stupid to even realize that the ones paying them were Russian.

      • grozzle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        They absolutely knew. There’s a note about them googling “time in Moscow” when their contact wasn’t replying, to see when they’d wake up and come back to work.

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m sure 99+% of them knew, but I’m not ruling out someone waking up to: “what? But the company that was paying me millions to convince people that Ukraine was the enemy was based in Illinois! There’s no way they they were Russian”. Every time I underestimate the stupidity of people they tend to surprise me, so I no longer do.

    • realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The idea that doing something with someone who turns out to be a foreign asset makes you a conspirator is a bit ridiculous. I don’t see anyone in this community accusing Kathy Hochul of being a Chinese asset since she’s a Democrat, but accusing her of that would be ridiculous too. She probably didn’t know that her aide was a Chinese agent.

      https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c6281zgjjneo

      • III@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I mean, Kathy Hochul was clearly not unwitting in her money laundering… so if your comparison is to say these right-wing influencers were completely aware of their Russian ties and were not duped at all, I am down with that.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        They new the people paying them worked from a Russian timezone, they actually put it in an email.

        • BrucePotality@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Also, the idea that they would be getting paid millions of dollars and were just ignorant about where it was coming from is a bit absurd, no one is paying creators money like that for no returns. They didn’t have any call to actions, no affiliate links, nothing. So there’s no way these large content creators didn’t know that that money was funny