• Lemonparty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Because the average person is stupid and will pay $4 for fucking water because it looks like an energy drink.

  • JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I like the idea of water in cans, this rivals one of own business ventures from a few years ago.

    The issue I have with this is that this is clearly a profit based initiative, and I do not believe environmental benefits are really considered unless it adds to the profit.
    Why do they not sell the cans at a reasonable price? Because it won’t make them a billion dollars if they did this.

    I just have my doubts that this has anything to do with doing any good for the planet, it’s just expensive water that exists to fill pockets with money. Any benefit seems like a side effect.

  • MudSkipperKisser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I just went to a festival that had only this brand for even regular still water, no water bottles with a cap. It was insanely irritating to not be able to just hang on to a bottle of water in my bag and pull it out whenever to take a sip, you have to just sit there and drink the whole water at once. Or toss it and spend another $6 to buy another can of water when you’re thirsty again. A small problem as problems go but frustrating at the time!

    • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I work as a bartender in a live music venue in the Netherlands.

      We, just like most festivals, used to always remove the caps from the water bottles, citing safety concerns (people would drop the bottle when empty but put the cap on, which is a nasty tripping hazard).

      So a company started to make bottlecaps that clip to your pants, and most water vendors used a single size opening, which made this feasible. People held on to their cap, and could pause drinking.

      Then water companies started to attach the cap to the bottle, to prevent litter, and the government issuing a mandate requiring us to charge per plastic unit.

      So now we leave the caps on, but as guests return about 95% of bottles and cups to the bar (buying a drink without having a cup adds a 1 eur plastic surcharge), the safety hazard is basically gone.

      As a bartender, I’d very much prefer bottles of water to cans. It allows guests to drink at their leasure, they’re easier to transport and can’t cause as much harm as a can (either by throwing or when squeezing it).

      They are slightly visually less appealing than a cool can though, I’ll give them that.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        (people would drop the bottle when empty but put the cap on, which is a nasty tripping hazard).

        How does having the cap on change the danger level of the hazard?

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            [I’m starting to enjoy the response I’m getting to this take. The passion, anger and vitriol directed at me for questioning this shit. It’s hilarious, and I just can’t help myself… Stepped on an empty water bottle with a cap on today and guess what happened? It was immediately crushed, and I am not a heavy person. Please, tell me again how angry that statement just made you]

            I suppose… Have you felt how thin the plastic is on water bottles these days though? I feel like the plastic would give first whether there’s a cap on or not. Maybe depends on the person’s weight.

            Edit: Lol lots of angry folks here. To the person who said I’m ignoring “actual data”: what fucking data? Somebody said a thing, and now that’s “data”? You’ve got some actual data about the dangers of stepping on water bottles?

            It seems like people are referring to unopened bottles of water. Didn’t see anything to indicate that in the original comment, but I guess it makes a little more sense if we’re talking about unopened bottles of water. Since we’re talking about trash that people throw on the ground, I guess I assumed the bottled was not only opened, but empty. Because it’s trash.

            That said, I stand by my original comment. Plastic water bottles are made of fucking tissue paper these days. They 100% would snap if someone stepped on an opened/empty bottle.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Plastic bottles are always pressurised at the factory. They can hold shit load of weight when closed, otherwise they would explode during the packaging process.

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I guess I was assuming the bottle wasn’t sealed shut since we’re talking about literal garbage that people throw on the ground.

                • Aux@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  If it’s not sealed then it doesn’t matter if the plastic is thinner by a few microns.