More efficient manufacturing, falling battery costs and intense competition are lowering sticker prices for battery-powered models to within striking distance of gasoline cars.

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    car from the 50s can still travel the same distance on a full tank

    How much have you spent in maintenance over the last 70 years to even keep it running?

    an electric car from the early 2010s can barely get around a car park

    Not even remotely true.

    • TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Assuming you need a new battery every 10 years or so considering that’s their usual lifespan you’re looking at spending $70,000-$140,000 at 10,000 - 20,000 per battery according to a quick Google search. Do you really think that someone is spending $2,000 a year just making sure a tiny roadster that was designed to be repaired with a spanner on a driveway can run?

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Again, not true.

        https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a31875141/electric-car-battery-life/

        If the battery is at less than 70% at 8 years, they’ll replace it free. My 10 year old Volt is still doing close enough to what it was new that I can’t tell the difference. It’s not like the battery just goes poof and turns into smoke after 10 years.

        A tiny roadster from the 50s is what, an MG, Fiat, maybe a Triumph? Any one of them are probably spending more time getting repaired than actually driving.

        Keeping a car from the 50s running today isn’t just tightening a bolt here and there anymore. Even sourcing the parts is likely going to be non-trivial at this point.