• mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    COBOL is actually not that bad. It can work with SQL, it can have unit testing/integration testing. It can even go on the web (LOL).

    But in all seriousness, the bad part about COBOL is lack of context. Most code that is in COBOL has not been touched in decades. And no one is willing to modify because of serous consequences (AKA job ruining errors) that can occur.

    I worked with it in insurance and transportation. In both cases, the COBOL was actually pretty solid…but we didnt know WHY we were doing the operations.

    • cerement@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      the old languages still have their fans – and COBOL, Fortran, Ada, and Lisp are still holding strong in their respective niches

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I took a principles of programming languages course a while back and got to touch on a lot of these old languages. My professor had huge hard-on for Lisp. Don’t get me wrong. The simplicity of the language is admirable. But reading and parsing that shit gave me headaches. No me gusta.