• uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    As I have had a really bad run of terrible dentist experiences, bridges are scary and implants are expensive, I’d really like this to work well, and be reasonably priced.

    ETA Or, it could be my superhero origin story.

    • Acters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Likely prohibitively expensive, will take a long af time to reach wider markets and most likely never pass trials

      All my predictions

    • goatsarah@thegoatery.dyndns.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      @uriel238 @cyu Realistically, I can’t see it being cheaper than implants, and will probably need lots of orthodontic treatment when the new tooth comes through.

      I have an implant, with bone regeneration, and honestly, it’s just a tooth. Even with the bone regeneration, my total time in the chair was probably less than 90 minutes.

      And, bonus, I can’t get toothache in it, and if it breaks, it’s 2 weeks to replace it like nothing happened.

      The only way I see this competing with implants if it’s cheaper (honestly can’t see that happening) or less hassle (again, seems unlikely).

      Implants are that good, and they’re gonna be hard to displace as the “gold standard” to replace missing teeth.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m surprised that mammals evolved to not regrow teeth. You’d think it would be a significant advantage.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Most mammals instead evolved to have their teeth keep growing, like beavers, thus they need to keep using their teeth to keep them from growing out of control.

      Secondly, humans in particular, added tooth-enamel-eating-bacteria into our diet hundreds of thousands of years ago. Before that, we didn’t have a huge number of issues with our teeth, and so perhaps not enough time has actually passed since we got the bacteria eats our teeth for an evolutionary advantage that stops it from being an issue? Evolution isn’t so cut and dry, it’s not like it’s trying to solve problems. People with resistances to mouth bacteria probably exist, but are they reproducing enough to become the dominant geneaology? Who the fuck knows?

    • MumboJumbo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wouldn’t imagine it’d play a role in reproducing though. It may help ones ability to live longer, but they have probably procreated long before tooth loss has become a major issue of well being or mortality.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If we regrow teeth, we can regrow bone, muscle, and nerves. Almost immediately, that technology will be privatized and only the rich will be able to afford it.

    Capitalism will say “Fuck you poors”.

      • Gnome Kat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not being able to talk about capitalism in a tech community is like having a fishing community and not being able to talk about how the waters got shit in it.