It’s exaggerated but it gets the point across: I too would like to know if AI tools were used to make even part of the image.
There’s a reason any editing is banned from many photography contests.
If they want to make a distinction between “made using AI” and “entirely AI generated”, sure. But “made using AI” completely accurately describes an image that used AI to generate parts of the image that were inconvenient in the original photo.
The analogy is exaggerated to the point where it implies a false sense of urgency. A peanut allergy can be deadly. The method used to edit an image cannot.
Someone is trivializing death just so they can make a point on the internet. That’s the part that irritates me. It’s like dragging politics into it Just let people have a serious discussion without taking things to a ridiculous extreme.
That person who makes the peanut analogy needs a slap in the head.
It’s exaggerated but it gets the point across: I too would like to know if AI tools were used to make even part of the image.
There’s a reason any editing is banned from many photography contests.
If they want to make a distinction between “made using AI” and “entirely AI generated”, sure. But “made using AI” completely accurately describes an image that used AI to generate parts of the image that were inconvenient in the original photo.
The analogy is exaggerated to the point where it implies a false sense of urgency. A peanut allergy can be deadly. The method used to edit an image cannot.
Someone is trivializing death just so they can make a point on the internet. That’s the part that irritates me. It’s like dragging politics into it Just let people have a serious discussion without taking things to a ridiculous extreme.