• explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They would have willfully misinterpreted both of those alternatives and convinced you they were poorly named anyways.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They may have willfully misrepresented, but couldn’t really have an excuse to mistakenly misinterpret them. That was our bad.

      • Nevoic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is your argument that a genuine, good faith interpretation of “Black Lives Matter” is “Only Black Lives Matter”?

        This isn’t how English works. If I say “I like your mom” to an SO, they wouldn’t interpret it as I don’t like them and instead like their mom. I don’t have to say “I like your mom too”.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Anyone coming back with “all lives matter” proves the ease of confusion over the slogan.

          My own immediate response to it was “Yah, of course they do. All lives matter. Why single out Black lives? The police shouldn’t be killing anyone.”

          I’m not going to try mind read anyone else.

        • timmymac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It should have been called of course black lives matter then move on from the stupid race baiting movement and get back to living.