• Pohl@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I agree, though I am super disdainful of any argument that is sort of reskinning “other people are really stupid”.

    On the other hand, participation in a congressional primary is pretty low and should weed out the casuals. Nobody who is going to the polls without much info is probably going to show up for these right?

    Further, when you have “safe” districts for your party, you sort of invite people from the entire political spectrum to participate in your primary. The parts of the American electorate that WANT muscular support for Israeli military operations are on the right. If those folks skip this primary, they have no influence over their representative at all. Activating conservative voters is probably easier than changing minds.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I agree, though I am super disdainful of any argument that is sort of reskinning “other people are really stupid”.

      I don’t consider ignorance and susceptible to sophisticated influence campaigns to mean “really stupid”.

      Perhaps I’m just using nicer language to say the same thing (or otherwise, ultimately, hold myself to be superior). That’s fair I suppose - but I’m aware of the circumstances and privilege that helped me achieve my perspective. I’m of the belief that, if given similar benefits, most would be just as “superior”.

      Now that I’ve demonstrated I’m superior, and humble, I still feel like this could have been avoided if people in the district voted instead of just ignoring the campaign or assuming, like I did, that people in the district would do better.

      To anyone reading this, if you are a resident in the district and didn’t vote for Bowman… do better next time for everyone’s sake.