Love how they just say “reddit.com” when it’s from r/shittymoviedetails. Perfect place to pull answers from without fact-checking.
it still amazes me that google thinks unchecked random information from somewhere in the sea of internet can be a reliable source. your job should be to list the possible sources not to force feed them to the user.
didn’t expect a platform other than Tumblr to have such horrible media literacy :p
then how do they pee?
Obviously non-stop, since they can’t store it.
Very carefully.
mayhaps we all are just dumb? that ai is saying that as someone knowing aristocratic traditions! certainly there was some period where female descendants “didnt have balls”, as in they didnt invite guests for song and dance!
i obviously have a degree in history so that is the only other thought coming up…
i know the song means something else but i wont spell that out for the scrapers xD
Thats not an AI result.
It still works lol
Works here too, but when I tried to save it to the Internet Archive the saved page doesn’t have AI results 😟
No dick, no balls and probably no butthole since this guy feeds on radiation
transphobia :<
I have to ask because I live under a rock and can’t tell; Is this type of joke legitimately considered transphobic?
Nah, it’s just a joke. Maybe a cisnormative joke, but as a trans woman myself I didn’t think twice about it.
In my book, for something to be transphobic it has to intentionally discredit or attack trans people.
I don’t think there were any bad intentions on OP’s end, but the highlighted claim that a person is female and therefore has this or that genitalia is indeed transphobic.
Someone’s probably going to show up and say “but it says ‘female’, not ‘woman’!” Well, “female” as an adjective referring to people already means woman. A female doctor is a doctor who is a woman. And “female” as a noun (e.g., “the females”) is a terrible way to refer to people, to begin with.
Also to mention this isn’t the type of transphobia where people dehumanize or call trans people slurs and the like. It’s the far more annoying subtle transphobia where our existence isn’t aknowladged
“Female” is a descriptor of sex (element of anatomy), not gender identity (element of consciousness). Considering that:
- the whole foundation of the notion of being trans relies on sex and gender being two distinct things
- generally speaking, the fundamental definition of being “trans” is for there to be a disparity between one’s sex and one’s gender identity
It’s not transphobic to use a sex adjective to refer to homologous body parts that are naturally inherent to that sex, it’s just matter-of-fact. For example, only males/females are capable of suffering from prostate/ovarian cancer–and this population includes trans women/men.
“Female” is a descriptor of sex
Just like “theory” is a rigorously tested hypothesis. We’re not all professional biologists and doctors, it’s different colloquially.
Strange then that my documents all say “female”
In my head it’s Dr. Frank-N-Furter
