• EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Your dissembling changes nothing. It only confirms my claim that you’re arguing in bad faith.

      Thanks for that!

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        ah there’s our miscommunication! i am not arguing anything i just misunderstood at first and offered a possible solution/additional context

        but i was wrong so i issued my apologies and asked for clarification :)

        you stated there was something that was a problem with the reporting, and i inaccurately surmised that it had to do with trans people experiencing hate. what was it in reality?

        • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          ah there’s our miscommunication!

          No. You’re clearly arguing in bad faith, and I’m not falling for it. And I’m calling you out on it. Deflecting is the tactic of a coward.

          Sealioning

          Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassmentthat consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.[1][2][3][4] It may take the form of “incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate”,[5] and has been likened to a  denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings.[6] The term originated with a 2014 strip of the webcomic Wondermark by David Malki,[7] which The Independent called “the most apt description of Twitter you’ll ever see”.[8]

          Just asking questions

          Just asking questions (also known as JAQing off, or as emojis: “🤔🤔🤔”[1]) is a way of attempting to make wild accusations acceptable (and hopefully not legally actionable) by framing them as questions rather than statements. It shifts the burden of proof to one’s opponent; rather than laboriously having to prove that all politicians are reptoid scum, one can pull out one single odd piece of evidence and force the opponent to explain why the evidence is wrong.

          The tactic is closely related to loaded questions or leading questions (which are usually employed when using it), Gish Gallops (when asking a huge number of rapid-fire questions without regard for the answers), and Argumentum ad nauseam (when asking the same question over and over in an attempt to overwhelm refutations).