The Oregon case decided Friday is the most significant to come before the high court in decades on the issue and comes as a rising number of people in the U.S. are without a permanent place to live.

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    you only matter if you own property.

    While technically true… There is a difference between a guy owning a factory and a guy owning a home.

    They are not the same lol

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Many people are few pay checks away from being homeless

        System works as intended

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      This is pedantic and totally irrelevant to the topic of homeless having no place to simply exist.

      Unless of course you are trying to highlight the billions of unhoused factory owners?

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Point being “home owner” is a temporaly housed person ;)

        You got own right property to be part of the right class.

        Learn to read

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            You can look at it like that…

            My value add here is clarifying detail was that was lost in that statement.

            I am not hurting the reader or the OP thesis, just adding to the body of work.