• xep@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Same thing that happened to the Chinese creators on Youtube despite it being banned in China, I presume.

  • Goodie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The same as what happened when vine shut down.

    Take their follows as best as they can to another platform. Continue on.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know why Amazon hasn’t bought TikTok yet.

    Lots of data, access to the Chinese market, a social media app under their wing, and an aligned work culture. Alongside the gains for ads, moving their shit to AWS, and retail gains, it seems like a better idea than throwing money into the AI fire.

      • nucleative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Wouldn’t be surprised if there was an exceptionally well funded US startup that makes a debut before TikTok is blocked if they don’t sell. TikTok has to weigh the possibility that they can’t compete if they don’t exist.

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Everything is for sale when you are a $1T+ company. That’s why Amazon has the likes of Blink, Ring, Alexa, Anthropic, etc.

          • EnderMB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 hours ago

            That’s…exactly why you would get involved?

            TikTok might lose out on revenue. Why not sell your US arm for lots of money?

            This is literally one of the most widely talked-about options regarding the ban of TikTok…

            • ___@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 hours ago

              They refused to entertain offers. 1T dollars seems mighty, but TikTok is a multi-year if not multi-decade data collection hub. That data is on the youth of America and their trajectories.

              That’s priceless to the power hungry. It’s not just money, it’s control.

              • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 hours ago

                That’s priceless to the power hungry. It’s not just money, it’s control.

                that’s why their banning it; they can’t control it in the way they want

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I could try to summarize it, but if you just do a web search for EFF and TikTok, you will come across a good explanation.

        Of course we don’t know how the courts will rule. My belief is that the odds are in favor of TikTok and of TikTok users, but we’ll have to wait and find out.

      • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think the argument would be that if money is freedom of speech then so should surveillance capitalism

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          The right for a business to operate is not protected by the first amendment, though.

          I could use that argument to stop the government from closing/dismantling any physical space because I might use their walls to express my first amendment rights. But the argument just doesn’t hold up.

          • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            It’s not the right of the business, it’s the right of US citizens to consume media and information from any source they please. The Govt has no right to say “You can’t read that newspaper” or “You can’t listen to that speaker”, so they have no right to say “You can’t get information through this app”. The first amendment isn’t just about the right to speak, it’s also about the right to listen and research especially the stuff the government doesn’t want you to know about.

      • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        In case you’re serious, a video-centric social media. It focuses on short vertical videos. Naturally, they’re generally too short to have much useful information, so it’s mostly dumb addictive content, or straight up misinformation. It’s meant to feel like you’re not wasting time while you definitely are. “I am not spending 15 minutes to watch a normal video, I just watched a few (maybe 50) short (around 1 minute) videos.”

        It’s like YouTube shorts.