• orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I could try to summarize it, but if you just do a web search for EFF and TikTok, you will come across a good explanation.

        Of course we don’t know how the courts will rule. My belief is that the odds are in favor of TikTok and of TikTok users, but we’ll have to wait and find out.

      • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think the argument would be that if money is freedom of speech then so should surveillance capitalism

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          The right for a business to operate is not protected by the first amendment, though.

          I could use that argument to stop the government from closing/dismantling any physical space because I might use their walls to express my first amendment rights. But the argument just doesn’t hold up.

          • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            It’s not the right of the business, it’s the right of US citizens to consume media and information from any source they please. The Govt has no right to say “You can’t read that newspaper” or “You can’t listen to that speaker”, so they have no right to say “You can’t get information through this app”. The first amendment isn’t just about the right to speak, it’s also about the right to listen and research especially the stuff the government doesn’t want you to know about.