• Cowbee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      What in the world are you on about? This is about how politicians will pay lip service to the public but will act in their own interestd, usually based on their donors.

      I get that you’re on Lemmy.world, where everyone outside of your anticommunist bubble everyone is a secret scary tankie, but this is even worse of a take than nornal.

          • 33550336@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            The “tankie bubble” is Lemmy.

            Not so. The tankiest instances are lemmygrad and hexbear, while I think sh.itjust.works is neocon or lib at best, not to mention nazi “exploding heads” so we have a whole spectrum. I think Lemmy.ml had tolerable tankiness, but since lemmygrad and hexbear were rightly defederated from most instances, the tankies and wumaos are poisoning Lemmy.ml and much of fediverse with genocide denialism, authoritarian propaganda, etc.

            • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              Both Hexbear and Lemmygrad are largely self-sufficient, some people likely have alts but the idea that they are “poisoning” Lemmy.ml is silly. Marxists have always been here.

              • 33550336@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 days ago

                Yes, Marxists have been on Lemmy.ml and this is a good thing. But there is difference between Marxists and supporters of authoritarian regimes like China, Russia or North Korea, who are denialists of genocides like Bucha, Katyn, Tiananmen, etc. and who are cheap wumao/govnoyed propagandists.

                • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  Suggesting people read Marx gets you called a Tankie. I have even seen Anarchists get called Tankie. The term is meaningless at this point, and people attach a bunch of scary baggage to it as a way to pretend everything left of Liberalism is tankie.

        • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          I mean give the man (or not) credit, some of the most powerful and influential countries in the world is where democracy suffers terribly either at the hand of despotism or at the hand of capitalism (likely both).

          • 33550336@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            the most powerful and influential countries

            these countries tend to dominate over other countries as they dominate over their own citizens. this should never be a goal. countries should be democratic between themselves as their citizens should be.

            • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Yea but still it remains that democracy as it exists now is a major failure in some of the most influential countries, making democracy a failure for more than what %80 of the world (USA, Russia, India, China, and many more middle sized countries too)?

              I dont think the meme is anti democratic per se, it is just anti democratic against a democracy of this type where usually people with a mentally ill levels of drive for power are at the top. It is making more fun of the fox than the sheep.

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                21 days ago

                The CPC has like a 95 percent approval rating according to Harvard polling, what are you talking about?

                  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    21 days ago

                    I mean, you’ve obviously done a successful revolution in your country, so you definitely know stuff about how to build socialism.

              • 33550336@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                21 days ago

                Well, it might be so. But I am just suspicious about tankies showing flaws of democracy since they use it to “show” the supposed supremacy of “communist”, authoritarian states as China.

                • jorp@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  You are conflating communism with authoritarianism as is commonly done on purpose or by accident to invalidate it. Anarchists are also often Communists and they oppose democracy for its oppressive properties as compared to consensus building and free association, that’s a critique of democracy from an even more libertarian perspective.

                  Socialists and Communists also believe in the democratization of the economy, so that a capitalist owner class doesn’t get to dictate how our labor and resources are allocated.

                  If you truly believe in freedom, you might be interested in anarcho-communism or socialism. Liberal democracy isn’t as free as you think.

                  • 33550336@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    20 days ago

                    You mean the idea of communism or actually existing “communist” countries, like China, USRR or North Korea?

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  Authoritarian is just a buzzword armchair generals throw around. All states rely on authority, including anarchist attempts like in Catalonia and Ukraine.

      • 33550336@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        it creates biased impression that democracy is generally like this. it’s like showing that ussr sucked, so any leftist ideology must sucks too

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          That’s not how I read it… it’s not really democracy if the guy being voted for is lying to the voters without repercussion (thus obstructing the voters’ right to make an informed decision) so they can get into office and do things they know the voters wouldn’t have voted for. That’s anti-democratic in itself. This meme isn’t saying democracy bad, it’s saying that what we have now isn’t a democracy.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Okay but the USSR didn’t suck, it was a good attempt at workers democracy with massive problems, but smaller problems than bourgeois democracy

          • 33550336@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            Yes, it also helped to liberate woman and gave them more opportunities, decreased illiteracy and MASSIVE russian retardancy, but overall it sucked at many levels and from the very start:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror – look at the passage on tortures. This alone made me to despise USSR.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              The red terror was much smaller than the white terror, and the torture is nothing that capitalist countries don’t do on the regular. I for one would like to decrease the amount of torture in the world.

              • 33550336@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                Yeah, I’ve heard about the white terror. This does not justify people who supposedly wanted a better world. I am quite sure that now amount of torture in western countries is negligible when compared with China and North Korea, and mostly by intrinsic flaws of e.g. police than political causes. And yes, I’ve heard about exceptions as Guantanamo or Pinoshit. Actually Pinoshit and Franco should not be counted as nominal western mindset, since they are authoritarian fascist piece of shits. I despise all authoritarian despots equally, no matter fascist Franco or “communist” Stalin.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  I am quite sure that now amount of torture in western countries is negligible when compared with China and North Korea

                  This sounds like western chauvinism. Hoe can you be sure? The US has soo many blacksites, hell even local PDs have them.

                  Guantanamo or Pinoshit. Actually Pinoshit and Franco should not be counted as nominal western mindset, since they are authoritarian fascist piece of shits.

                  Pinochet was straight up supported by the west until it was too politically inconvenient, but by that time he’d already done his job of eradicating the left. Franco wouldn’t have won if it wasn’t for Britain, France, etc, enforcing “no arms and troops shipments” for the USSR but not for Italy and Germany. And they also weren’t willing to accept Spanish republican gold.

                  I despise all authoritarian despots equally, no matter fascist Franco or “communist” Stalin.

                  Hmm. One of these people was a dictator. The other was democratically elected and lead the industrialization of a society that allowed it to defeat the industrial superpower that was Germany and end the holocaust.

                  • 33550336@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    16 days ago

                    This sounds like western chauvinism. Hoe can you be sure?

                    And how can you be sure? Given nontransparent smokescreen of all red imperialist countries like USSR, China and North Korea?

                    The other was democratically elected

                    Oh yes, USSR, the famous standard of democracy /s

                    end the holocaust

                    *replace it with the gulag system