Hy,

In your opinion do you prefer Bitwarden or Proton Pass and why?

It seems proton pass have better integration with Firefox.

Good and bad?

Thanks.

  • vilna@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Both are open source. I will use the free version. Proton pass seems to have a UI more polish.

    • binom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      i trust proton quite a lot, but the open source part seems to be only partially true. on their github, i can only find client side code (ie. browser extensions, mobile apps), not the server code, which bitwarden does publish

  • parachaye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Been a longtime user of Bitwarden (free, and over the last year paid). It’s a straightforward/good but a bit boring UI, connects very well and easily into browser, phone etc. Works well, highly recommended, and having 2FA on paid version is awesome.

    Been trying out Proton Pass for the last few days since I already pay for Proton Unlimited. It’s got a good UI and so far it’s been working well in Firefox and on my phone. It’s much better integration with Simple Login features so I like the slightly more seemless sign-up ability. It’s not 100% feature parity with Bitwarden paid though.

    Bottom line - I prefer proton pass as a heavy proton user already BUT if I just wanted a standalone password manager, Bitwarden is probably better. Both are good options though, and competition is good.

  • GrumbleGrim@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t combine email, password manager, or 2FA authenticator together with the same company. All 3 should be completely separate from each other.

    Bitwarden has a distinct advantage for this reason alone.