Sorry if this is not the proper community for this question. Please let me know if I should post this question elsewhere.

So like, I’m not trying to be hyperbolic or jump on some conspiracy theory crap, but this seems like very troubling news to me. My entire life, I’ve been under the impression that no one is technically/officially above the law in the US, especially the president. I thought that was a hard consensus among Americans regardless of party. Now, SCOTUS just made the POTUS immune to criminal liability.

The president can personally violate any law without legal consequences. They also already have the ability to pardon anyone else for federal violations. The POTUS can literally threaten anyone now. They can assassinate anyone. They can order anyone to assassinate anyone, then pardon them. It may even grant complete immunity from state laws because if anyone tries to hold the POTUS accountable, then they can be assassinated too. This is some Putin-level dictator stuff.

I feel like this is unbelievable and acknowledge that I may be wayyy off. Am I misunderstanding something?? Do I need to calm down?

  • nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m pissed that Biden isn’t calling their bluff and breaking a ton of laws right now.

  • littlecolt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, have you browsed Lemmy or the general internet the past few days??? How can you still be asking “is anyone else” at this point?

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pretty sure we all are at least a little ticked off about it. Except for maybe all the fat oranges magats out there

  • DeadHorseX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    The president can personally violate any law without legal consequences.

    This isn’t true.

    They ruled that the President has criminal immunity for official acts in line with the constitutional rights and duties of the POTUS.

    They also ruled that non-official acts, or acts taken in a personal capacity as a private citizen, are not immune to criminal prosecution, and that there’s a large gray area in between the two where it needs to be decided on a case-by-case basis.

  • ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I wonder who killed JFK. Yeah it was Bush Senior and his ilk. Those responsible for the business (biznuss) plot by fascist scum in the 30s to coup d’etat the American government then. If it was not for Smedley Butler being the person they tried to get to lead this failed coup, and him going to congress instead to lead their army of hundreds of thousands… history would be VERY different.

    This link is a link to one of Americas greatest heroes, in my opinion. I hope he rests in peace.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smedley_Butler

    This link has a picture of the most ruthless killers in history all together cozy as a family, being two faced little biatches & fleecing the American people with wedge issue politics where people morally feel they need to choose a side (abortion, gun control, social issues like LGBTQ rights etc), instead of the American people uh, focusing on the economic side of things . https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/04/the-story-of-the-viral-photo-of-the-presidential-families.html

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Biden has no balls. He should take one for the team and order the execution of SCOTUS. Either he gets prosecuted or he’ll put an end to this nonsense by force. Even if he gets prosecuted he’s old as fuck he’ll never see prison.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel like if Trump wins the election, my trans ass is going to end up in a concentration camp. Kinda hope I die before that happens.

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    You are right to be concerned. If this is not reversed soon and with a bang, the USA would either be in a civil war or start WWIII in the next 5 years

  • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The argument I saw for this was that a president shouldn’t have to second guess every action they take while in office. That if they are held liable for everything they do, they may be paralyzed to make changes to the government.

    I kinda thought that was kinda what the founders wanted to happen…

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This ruling was made for trump.

    Think of how much trump has done, legally, questionably legal, and illegal, while in office.

    Now remove accountability for any of it while ignoring the virtually Sisyphean task already faced to prosecute what he’s (and those surrounding him have) already done, and we have yet to see any sufficiently deterrent sentence being passed.

    Now also imagine the arguing over what constitutes “official” acts, you bet your ass that one side is going to be perfectly happy to “officially” let trump shoot someone on 5th avenue.

    This strips trump and those like him of the merest inconvenience of facing charges when they leave office. If they leave office.

    It’s potentially disastrous on multiple levels.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Pretty much every democrat is indeed highly concerned… Along with plenty of moderate Rs. It’s the far right fascists and their moronic blind followers that are rejoicing and the remaining people just don’t have the time or intelligence to care.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This could easily lead to not firing the public servants that are not loyal enough, but outright assassinating them at best, or just Trump keeping the presidency (dictatorship) until the end of his life instead of holding elections at worst.