Boeing will plead guilty to a criminal fraud charge stemming from two deadly crashes of 737 Max jetliners after the government determined the company violated an agreement that had protected it from prosecution for more than three years, the Justice Department said Sunday night.

Federal prosecutors gave Boeing the choice this week of entering a guilty plea and paying a fine as part of its sentence or facing a trial on the felony criminal charge of conspiracy to defraud the United States.

Prosecutors accused the American aerospace giant of deceiving regulators who approved the airplane and pilot-training requirements for it.

The plea deal, which still must receive the approval of a federal judge to take effect, calls for Boeing to pay an additional $243.6 million fine. That was the same amount it paid under the 2021 settlement that the Justice Department said the company breached. An independent monitor would be named to oversee Boeing’s safety and quality procedures for three years.

The plea deal covers only wrongdoing by Boeing before the crashes, which killed all 346 passengers and crew members aboard two new Max jets. It does not give Boeing immunity for other incidents, including a panel that blew off a Max jetliner during an Alaska Airlines flight in January, a Justice Department official said.

  • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Boeing made $76B in revenue in 2023. This is slightly more than 1 day’s revenue for them ($210M / day) or a bit more than 10 days profit for them ($21M / day). They will keep doing what they’re doing, but increase their spending on a PR campaign to improve their public image.

    • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Exactly. This is like if you charged the average person $1 for causing a major motorway accident.

      It’s a joke of a fine in the face of Boeing’s profits - basically telling them they can get away with severe and wreckless disregard for human life in return for just over a week’s profits.

    • eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      They will keep doing what they’re doing

      Wrong.

      This plea deal helps them quantify the cost of safety lapses, which they didn’t have before. Now they know that they’ll only get fined a tiny bit, they know that it’ll be worth it to cut further corners if that helps them sell maybe 5-10 more planes in total.

  • pwnicholson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    They did it once, then did it again and not only is it still just a fine, the fine didn’t even go up. Given inflation since then, the fine actually went down in real terms.

    That’ll teach them for sure! /s

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      “You have to put over $400 million of your own money and launder it back around into the safety department of your own company”

      That’ll teach em.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I liked it better when large corps could go dark practically overnight, e.g. Enron. Andersen, et al.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        More specifically, the government got Enron but the PR campaign waged by corporate lobbyists is directly responsible for the milquetoast prosecutions since then. They actually got a majority of Americans to believe the government was at fault for people losing their jobs and pensions. The pensions that were already embezzled. And the jobs that were already getting cut because the embezzling was starting in on the corporation.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Too big to fail means too big to exist, you’re a defacto monopoly and need to be broken apart if you’re too big to fail.

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Being monopolistic does not mean you have no competitors, but that you are big enough to adversely affect the free market so that you can’t be competed with.

            So yeah, it counts, and so does Apple for example.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Damn, I wish I could commit felony fraud and get off with just a fine.

    Although, doesn’t the government usually prefer to not work with convicted felons? Does this mean they’ll prefer other companies for contracts, etc.?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      We’d need to actually have an aviation market instead of (checks notes) two corporations.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        One. Airbus is foreign competition, just like the Chinese company that now is entering the market.

        The US govt will not buy Airbus over Boeing, and will not let airlines overwhelmingly switch to it either.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          We don’t need Boeing for for passenger jets. We need them for, well let’s just roll out the list.

          • AH-64
          • CH-47
          • V-22
          • F-15
          • F-18
          • C-17
          • KC-46
          • T-7

          And I’m getting tired of copying things from their Wikipedia. It goes on into drones and missiles too. So this isn’t about the foreign competition, it’s about keeping a part of our defense industry marginally competitive with Boeing and Lockheed both kicking around.

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            So there is the market capitalist solution of breaking them up and letting the pieces compete with each other, or the socialist solution of nationalizing them.

            If this goes on, how do you know any of those airframes aren’t as much of a sham as the 787?

            This is how you end up with an army like Russia.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    So basically they will say sowwy, they get a wrist slap, and then we coke party like it’s 2099?

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The people who need to be held accountable, won’t be. They’ll continue to live in lavish luxury without any repercussions.

    It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it.

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Pleading to avoid criminal charges regarding cases where people died should not be a thing…

  • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Are we filing charges against sock puppets named Boeing? Who is the man in charge? Over three hundred people are dead. Those families deserve justice, not whatever this is.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      In the US the corporation acts as a legal shield, except in criminal cases. The fact that the DOJ hasn’t ripped that shield away and stuck a probe up their ass tells you everything you need to know about how true my first sentence is. Despite hearing it ad nauseum every time something like the Ohio train crash happens.