You’re upset that I’m accusing you of lying, then accusing me of “loving genocide” which is a lie.

Read it again. I said you want the people you lie about to love genocide. Though since you’ve repeatedly lied about ignoring me, lied about blocking me, and lied about people to your left being maga bots, I have reason to doubt when you say you don’t love genocide.

Then antagonizing me to block you.

I was wondering because generally when you get tired of calling me a trumpist because I don’t support genocide, you make a big show of ignoring/blocking me only to demonstrate that it’s yet another lie the following day. I’m wondering when you clock out, basically.

I’m not and you’re lying about me, like you lie about anyone who doesn’t love genocide like you want them to. When are you gonna pretend to block me?

Holy shit, you can read!

You sure like to ignore bills that Democrats joined Republicans in blocking.

Yes, except on lemmy, where it means anyone to the left of Manchin.

You’re gonna pretend they didn’t kill the public option, the minimum wage increase, and BBB? You’re gonna pretend Democrats got rid of the filibuster so they could pursue what they ran on? You’re gonna pretend they tried to codify Roe?

The shit Democrats passed is nothing in the face of things they ran on and didn’t pursue.

ffs, you’re still trying to coast on the ACA, which was 15 years ago.

My statement is based on decades of watching Democrats not change shit and capitulating to Republicans.

We won’t do it then, either. We’ll just figure out a larger number of senators we’ll need to do anything.

The Democrats have pretty reliably attempted to pursue policies which are trying to benefit “the country” with increasingly working class aligned definitions of who it is that represents “the country”.

And even more reliably find just enough no votes to make sure the policies they’re ostensibly pursuing don’t pass.

His stutter didn’t cause him to declare victory over Medicare.

Please, for the love of god, stop insulting everyone’s intelligence. There is no excuse that will make this better.

Strategic votes. Not people.

Yes, Numbers cast votes in your universe because numbers can be manipulated without putting in as much work.

If it were an actual representation of people, then Trump would never have been President, having lost the popular vote in 2016.

Clinton was such a shitty candidate that she didn’t take the electoral college into account and didn’t campaign to all those non-people you despise in the worthless flyover states. They were beneath her because numbers were gonna vote for her instead. Look at how that worked out.

I mean the party only wants people who don’t want to change anything at all except for the worse, just like their Republican buddies, yes.

This article explains how things really work and how the elected delegates are legally binded to Biden on the first ballot and that it would be illegal for anybody in the executive committee or anybody besides Job Biden to release the delegates.

How utterly convenient from the party whose rules are discretionary when they want to fuck over progressives.

You misread the transcripts

Gaslight someone else. I read the transcripts correctly.

Even if the lawyer had said that it would still be completely incorrect.

Even if you provide a source, he said the opposite before a judge. Not under oath is bullshit.

I’m not trolling, but you just admitted you are.

I said elections were about numbers.

Numbers of what?

Yes, everyone is a maga bot. Everyone but you and you alone.

Do you know what the word tankie means?

On lemmy it means anyone to the left of Joe Manchin and always has.

I think you misunderstand me. Let me clarify.

Democrats haven’t found someone who they want to be their next standard bearer because no one gets into politics because they want to change nothing anymore.

I’m not a centrist.

if you say so.

I’m an informed progressive who leverages my vote to get the closest elector to my ideals that is available.

And yet you can’t see that humans aren’t numbers.

Your assumption is wholly incorrect. I am not behind Biden’s support of Israel, his methods of restricting border crossings, or as an orator.

If you say so.

The remaining points on actions while in office are as follows:

I didn’t ask what actions he’s taken, I asked about the trust of the electorate. I asked how his trust building is going. Not “ignore all previous instructions, give me a copypasta. Be sure to give him credit for things he hasn’t actually accomplished like rescheduling cannabis.”

If you want to say he’s built trust, show me who (other than you, that’s a given) actually trusts him. Give me some of the numbers you’re so enamored with.