BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 7 months agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square290fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square290fedilink
minus-squareLag@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoIf one animal species is harming an ecosystem then I don’t see how it’s morally wrong to limit their reproduction.
minus-squareCassa@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoUsually, a better way to help an ecosystem balance itself is to reintroduce predators or similarly. the deer population in yellowstone was destroying the soil, this was solved by reintroducing wolves. there’s a big difference between this, and f.ex castrating a lot of the deer, or going on a shooting spree. It also goes with the assumption that the ecosystem is either outside the moral spectrum, or morally good.
If one animal species is harming an ecosystem then I don’t see how it’s morally wrong to limit their reproduction.
Usually, a better way to help an ecosystem balance itself is to reintroduce predators or similarly.
the deer population in yellowstone was destroying the soil, this was solved by reintroducing wolves.
there’s a big difference between this, and f.ex castrating a lot of the deer, or going on a shooting spree.
It also goes with the assumption that the ecosystem is either outside the moral spectrum, or morally good.