• Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Because Thomas literally gave her that argument to make in the immunity ruling. She literally cited his comments and basically copied his ruling like a high school kid copying off the “smart” kid in the class.

    He basically told her “Hey, throw the case out. We’ve got your back.”

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s the Thomas two-step. He uses these concurrences to issue marching orders to the judges below him, so that it can be challenged up to the Supreme Court and then his concurrence becomes precedent.

        • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Thomas is not the supreme court. And he’s starting to alienate himself from even the other conservative justices. He’s on an island and I doubt the others would follow his lead if this reaches SCOTUS on appeal.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            They’ll rule it’s Constitutional to hunt Democrats for their pelts and you’ll still be pretending the Court is legitimate. 🙄