SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 23 days agoNokia rulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageNokia rulelemmy.dbzer0.comSimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 23 days agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squaremadjo@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·23 days agoIt had a belt clip, that was the only reason to get one of these. I had one.
minus-squarelunarul@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·23 days agoAnd the cover was mostly to keep the phone form getting dirty when not in use, not to protect it when dropped.
minus-squareInFerNo@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·23 days agoAnd rain, I don’t think these had IP ratings
minus-squaredependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·22 days agoI have too much self respect to clip anything to my belt /s
minus-squaremadjo@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·22 days agoYou were the king/queen with a Nokia on your belt.
minus-squareNoIWontPickAName@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·21 days agoIt’s really too bad how much their smartphones suck compared to the old phone days. Them and Kodak
It had a belt clip, that was the only reason to get one of these. I had one.
And the cover was mostly to keep the phone form getting dirty when not in use, not to protect it when dropped.
And rain, I don’t think these had IP ratings
I have too much self respect to clip anything to my belt /s
You were the king/queen with a Nokia on your belt.
It’s really too bad how much their smartphones suck compared to the old phone days.
Them and Kodak