• Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Gotta call this one inaccurate. The Bible says some shit about false gods and whatnot.

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      That’s old testament. What Jesus said overrode that.

      Its a very common mistake since a lot of christian groups pull their hate from the old testament.

      Specifically, Matthew 5:43-48

      And, to be clear, worshipping another god remains a sin in basic Christianity, its just not an excuse to not love everyone.

        • Lmaydev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Christians pick and choose what parts of the old testament to teach.

          When my kids had bibles forced on them the old testament wasn’t included at all.

          The way it’s been explained to me in the past is that a lot of the old testament is very strict rules for surviving in the desert 2000+ years ago.

          You’ll find only the really hateful sects of Christianity lean heavily on it.

      • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        That’s weird because earlier in the same chapter it contradicts exactly what you said that he’s not changing any of the old testament laws except for I think animal sacrifices he talks about specifically elsewhere:

        17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."

        The reason the Christian bible includes the old testament afaik is because when the new testament gospels were being written 70+ years after Jesus died they wanted to convert Jewish people so they wrote how Jesus fulfills prophecies made in the Hebrew bible.

        • Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          I’ve always heard it explained that the “fulfillment of the law” doesn’t abolish them, it fulfills the obligation and renders it moot, paving the way for the new covenant with Jesus as the penultimate sacrifice.

          • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            Even if you could accept that interpretation of fulfillment that would mean the “heaven and the earth disappear” already happened, which I’m pretty sure isn’t the case.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Gotta call this one inaccurate. The Bible says some shit about false gods and whatnot.

      Jesus repealed several older provisions.

    • MissGutsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Gotta call this one inaccurate. The Bible tells YOU not to have false gods, it doesn’t say you should hate other religions. I’d argue that the parable of the good samaritan in Luke 10:25-37 actually argues the exact opposite: “Love your neighbor as yourself” no matter who that person is

      Also “some shit”: Colossians 3:8 “But now you must put them all away: anger, wrath, malice, slander, and obscene talk from your mouth.”

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Why isn’t the “no matter who that person is” part in quotes? What if they’re a witch?

        I’m not really gonna bother reading the Bible any more just to argue about all this. I don’t really care. There’s some real fuckshit in there.

        • Lmaydev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          It really seems like you have no idea about the topic at hand. So I don’t get why you argued in the first place tbh.

              • Mango@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                29 days ago

                I only quizzed for two years on Matthew and Luke, and it was literally 17 years ago.

                • Zahille7@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  So why the fuck do you give a shit about any of this now?

                  Or are you just trying to be a pedantic asshole?

                  • Mango@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    29 days ago

                    I’m definitely a bit pedantic, I’ll give you that. I just came in here to point out that the Bible isn’t all sunshine and daisies.