I have no idea about William Hill. But the odds they describe sound about right to me, and the Nate Silver thing and the summary of Trump’s speech sound informative

inb4 BIDEN COPIUM HAHAHA etc and etc

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I do think it’s funny that Biden’s team has figured out that the winningest move is to just talk about Republican policies, 2025, etc. My entire life I’ve pretty much only wanted to talk policy and rolled my eyes at every single other thing that people said mattered, and it’s like I’m finally getting just a little vindication.

    • jeeva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The only sad thing is that it seems like they’re (still?) only talking about the other side’s policy, rather than backing their own policy based on its strength.

      Just “I’m not the other side” (but at least with policy rather than personality)

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      As someone mentioned, Wisconsin is known for cheese, lots and lots of dairy farms and whatnot out there.

      I actually have a coworker who came from Wisconsin and he will walk around drinking a 1/4 gallon of milk regularly lol

    • Noxy@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      definitely a wisconsin thing. I had a foam cheesehead when I was a kid.

    • Delusional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yup the idiots will still vote for him no matter what happens. Aliens could pop out of his skull and claim they’ve been operating him all along to destroy the earth and they’d still vote for him.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        If your vote didn’t matter, try wouldn’t be trying to make it harder (or blocking efforts to make it easier).

        VOTE

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Please do explain how the necessity of further action “makes it harder to vote”.

          If people are so pathologically demand-avoidant that asking them to do more than just vote makes them stop voting then yelling at them to vote isn’t going to help either.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’ve basically given up worrying about federal politics; I STILL VOTE IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS, but it’s clear they’re too solidly captured by special interests to do much there. I’ve shifted my focus to local/municipal politics and found a lot more success there.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    You think everyone is just tired of this shit? Both these dudes are older than my grandfather when he died. I am fucking tired boss. It shouldn’t be this crazy just to get sensible candidates who are actual human beings. It really shouldn’t.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If a hypothetical person with all your favorite attributes got elected, after 2 years of propaganda you’d be complaining about how awful they are.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Idk the Drop Biden propaganda isn’t really landing with me, and I dont do any other media besides Lemmy. Plus, working in construction has me surrounded by Trumpets everywhere and its not convincing me at all. I’m not immune by any means, but I’m not a fair weather fan either.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If only the well wasn’t poisoned with REPLACE BIDEN NOW OR WORLD WILL END ALSO KAMALA SUCKS bullshit, 5-10 times every hour, some of it coming yesterday still with fresh Cyrillic in its video description, we could have an adult conversation about what a good Democratic strategy would be, so that the end of the world doesn’t get elected

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Absolutely correct. But even if the choice is a shitty one it’s also a very easy one. If you want fascism, vote for Trump. If not, vote for Biden.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Or whoever the Democratic nominee is

        There’s a perfectly reasonable conversation to be had about replacing Biden being a better strategy. 10 seconds of thinking will lead one to realize that figuring out the strategy, and then switching to it, is way better than dumping Biden and then figuring out the strategy afterwards. And, it’s notable that all the same outlets who are openly hostile to democracy in the United States were the ones that were pushing so hard on the backwards version of the strategy, until the more gullible parts of the Democratic Party apparatus eventually picked it up and started running with it.

        The forward strategy is still fine. The loud preemptive drumbeat of hard criticism of Kamala that is now emerging, though, should hopefully serve as a big loud blaring fucking wake up call to anyone who is sincerely interested in defeating Trump who is still echoing the backwards version.

        • dragontamer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I’ve said it before I’ll say it again. I’m voting for Kamala but it’s not clear she’s better than Biden as a strategy.

          But what is clear is that Kamala is better than nearly everyone else the Democrats can crown between today and the DNC. We only have a 4 months before the election and Kamala is the only one who was actually campaigning at all.

          So if we replace Biden, it’s almost purely to give Kamala a running mate. That’s about it, and these value in this.

          • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah. To me the only options with any level of realistic viability are:

            1. Biden
            2. Harris
            3. Contested convention, someone with a baseball bat in hand talks firmly to the DNC about not fucking everything up with their foot on the scales like they did in 1968 and 2016, and see what shakes out of an actually fair process

            Anything else is nonsense. I have no real ironclad feelings about which of those options is best, although I lean towards 1 or 3, but the DUMP BIDEN RIGHT NOW, NOW NOW NOW, DON’T THINK ABOUT IT BOY DON’T ASK QUESTIONS JUST DO IT OR ELSE YOU DOOM AMERICA AND IT’LL ALL BE YOUR FAULT idea doesn’t appear in that list. To me.

            • dragontamer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Yeah. I’m not against removing Biden (even if I think keeping Biden is the best option). I’m just against a brainless, plan less removal of Biden.

              I’ve pointed out how Liberals rallied in 2011 for Occupy Wall Street only for Republicans to win in 2012, 2014 and 2016. People need to think about politics of they ever want to get ahead.

              It’s not sufficient to just get together in a large rally. We need actual votes.


              I feel like #2 and #3 will likely lead to Kamala. I’m up for an open and fair convention even if Kamala isn’t selected.

    • Freefall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m not voting for either candidate, I am voting for the people around Biden and against people that support P2025. Pretty simple.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        As someone who didn’t think Biden was a good choice in 2020 I fully agree, his administration seems to actually make things better!

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The people that vote for trump don’t care.

    Christ, they wear diapers and put fake ear bandages on. You think they give a damn about what’s actually right?

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The polls are literally telling you that it’s neck and neck right now. If this isn’t clear to you, the problem isn’t the polls.

        • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I don’t cast my vote based on polls polls and no one should. They’re full of shit. Everyone needs to vote like they don’t exist.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            They’re full of shit.

            While I agree that people should vote like they don’t exist, the reality is that they do a good job of giving you an idea of where voters stand. They were historically accurate in 2022.

            If you think “they’re full of shit” it’s almost certainly a problem of understanding rather than with the polls themselves. Considering you haven’t really made an argument as to why, I can’t know for sure.

    • normalexit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The person losing more is the one that most recently opened their mouth and reminded voters who they are.

    • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’re lying cause Trumps winning to the point high level democratic members are openly admitting Bidens gonna lose. All this is pitiful window dressing.

      • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        In a race to the bottom I never bet against trump. Literally if Biden stops talking today I bet he’d have a better chance of winning by the end of it.

    • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Just vote, volunteer to help give rides to people that wouldn’t be able to vote without it. If everyone votes, there will be no chance for the racist rapist with 34 felonies that has said on record that he will be a dictator.

    • Sho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Same, it’s like bad actors are muddying the waters on purpose, ignore it all. Vote

    • enbyecho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Losing implies that something happened. Like in a race a contestant is visibly ahead, or in gambling you have more chips than someone else or your money is all gone.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The answer is no one knows. If you care, vote and don’t be complacent. Even if the news decides they think they know, they still don’t know.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      While it looks like half the country is split between this dipshits, in reality the majority of Americans agree on a shockingly high number of issues.

      One of those issues is that both options are fucking awful, so who’s “losing” harder is matter of witchcraft at the moment as things violently spiral into the ridiculous

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Biden is not really that awful as an option, as far as it goes. If he is in decline, he steps down after the win. It’s not like Biden as a choice is comparable to donnie as a choice. They are night and day.

        Now, trying to sell Biden as a product to “independents” (aka, the low info) because we sell politicians like the way we sell consumer goods like fizzy sugar water - that’s not so great, since the bothsiderists keep acting like they are equally bad options.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        in reality the majority of Americans agree on a shockingly high number of issues.

        And it’s exactly why I say this every single day in some comment or another: I FUCKING HATE PROPAGANDISTS!!!

        What you said is absolutely true and without the likes of Fucker Carlson, Sean Hamface, and Laura Inbread, we’d actually have some fucking semblance of unity and solidarity… But no, we get divide and conquer… Hate hate hate hate. Fox primetime is literally the “two minutes hate” from 1984 with an ever changing Goldstein.

  • elgordino@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve been tracking the odds on Betfair. They have moved from 1.54 to 1.58 (decimal odds, 1 is dead cert, 2 is 50/50), so very marginally less likely Trump win. ‘Slumped’ they have not.

    Harris is at 5.4 and Biden way behind at 15.5.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Where are you looking and when did it say it was updated?

      Here’s what I see on Betfair; updated as of July 13th it says:

      • Donald Trump = 1.654/6 = 1.28 decimal = 78% win
      • Joe Biden = 10.09/1 = 11.1 decimal = 9% win
      • Kamala Harris = 5.69/2 = 3.85 decimal = 26% win

      (Note they sum to more than 100%, because of the “house cut” nonreciprocal nature of the odds)

      If there are more recently updated numbers that now say 1.58 decimal, that would mean the odds of Trump winning have dropped from 78% to 63%. I’d say that’s a fuckin slump.

      (Also note - that doesn’t mean they think Biden has a 10% chance of winning if he stays in. It means the chance he will stay on as the nominee times the chance he will win in the election is 10% – although looking at their odds for who the D nominee will be, it looks like they also think he has a lower chance of winning than Kamala, if he is the nominee.)

      • dingdongmetacarples@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        So what are they basing this article on? William Hill odds? Nate Silver’s opinion? I wouldn’t put much stock in that. Is Trump going to lose 4 points of support because of a speech? Doubtful.

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          He’s basing it on none of that. Newsweek pumps out Biden copium articles like crazy and the same few rotating accounts post every single one of them.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Okay, Democrats, what’s the play here then? Better ride this news with some really strong moves to amplify the impact. Don’t fuck it up, PLEASE.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think the chances of Harris vs Biden winning are incorporated into this percentage. But it doesn’t separate out the factors such as likelihood of being the nominee vs likelihood of winning the GE. So we can’t say anything definitive about that without more information on how it’s being calculated.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The article says P(Biden wins) < P(Harris wins). It isn’t saying anything directly about P(Biden nominated) or P(Biden wins | Biden nominated) but it does imply that P(Biden nominated) is low.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well that’s a click bait title. It’s based on betting markets that the head line completely misinterprets. The article itself admits Trump is still the favorite by far.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Newsweek seems to be the only publication making these claims. We’ve had some 2-3 weeks of Newsweek reportage of the Trump campaign floundering, its wheels falling off, and it circling the drain. Given Newsweek’s right-wing ownership and recently poor reputation for facts, it does feel like an op (perhaps to lull progressive campaigners into a false sense of security?)

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Over the same period, Biden’s odds of securing reelection later this year deteriorated substantially to just 12/1 (7.7 percent) as the president faces pressure from within his own party to withdraw from the race.

    Donald Trump remains the overwhelming favorite, but his odds have lengthened a touch – now 8/15 to return to the White House.

    Yeah…