‘Looks at perfectly functional Galaxy Watch 3 on my wrist’

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I think it’s telling that monetizing the operating system is the immediate place one jumps to with this, rather than earning more profit by selling more products which are better for the consumer.

    • golli@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Yeah, sadly from a economic perspective it is kind of obvious how a continuous source of revenue might be more appealing compared to a one time purchase. Especially with a product like TVs that usually have a pretty long lifetime before being replaced.

      Although i would point out that (at least in our current society) privacy and an ad-free experience in many ways is treated as a luxury good. Persumably a TV with a better OS would be sold at a higher price, and confronted with this choice many consumers would likely choose the cheaper one.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        privacy as a luxury good

        Sounds like what Apple is trying to do…

        Sadly wanting privacy is kind of a niche thing, not a large # of people buying iPhones to avoid surveillance. And most TV buyers DGAF… If a large # of them opted out of content recognition we’d still have dumb TVs on the market.

        Unfortunately I think without some kind of regulation that makes personal info a liability / hot potato, it will still be treated as an asset to be collected:(