Reminder to switch browsers if you haven’t already!


  • Google Chrome is starting to phase out older, more capable ad blocking extensions in favor of the more limited Manifest V3 system.
  • The Manifest V3 system has been criticized by groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation for restricting the capabilities of web extensions.
  • Google has made concessions to Manifest V3, but limitations on content filtering remain a source of skepticism and concern.
  • enbyecho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    This post reminded me to try out Brave. It’s based on Chromium but purports to block ads and trackers…

    Anybody else use it?

    Edit: Interesting. Anyone care to explain the downvotes? I know nothing about this browser other than it purportedly blocks Youtube ads, which are driving me nuts.

    Edit2: Well shit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Eich

    I had no idea about this guy. Ok, so completely not an option.

    • cyberic@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      My brother uses it, just remember to look through the ad settings. There was a toggle at one point to allow their approved ads or something like that.

      • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        i tried brave recently after finding out it’s open source, and that setting is off by default. ended up keeping firefox, because on android somehow the new tab page in brave is even worse than in ff. too tricky to access bookmarks.

        • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          I still to this day don’t know how to get back to the tab I was on in firefox-android if I get to the new tab screen. It’s been 2 or 3 years since the redesign.

          • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 days ago

            you need to close keyboard, hit the tab icon on the address bar and select the tab. easier way is to open some recent website and either close the current one or swipe from the address bar. it’s stupid.

      • RokAlamSeth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Too bad for your little black and white worldview those are the same people against adblockers. The good thing is this world has sensible people like me who could give less of a fuck who’s feeling is getting hurt and only care about our browsing experience. The rest can go die for all I care.

  • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    I’m sorry. I’ve seen this so many times today and I can’t stand it anymore.

    I hate this article photo. What the fuck is that shit?? Gloveless fingers? Digit warmer? Turtlefinger sweater?

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Pretty great outcome for firefox really.

      I don’t think firefox numbers will get a huge & immediate bump, but I think that over time it will support a reputation for firefox as being cool different and just plain better.

      I can’t imagine raw-dogging the internet without an ad blocker in 2024. I’m aware that most people aren’t bothered by ads, but surely… surely some people might be interested in blocking them if they become aware that it’s possible and easy.

  • majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    The silver lining here is that you’d hope that more people will simply adopt Firefox. It’s user share has been too low for too long given how great it is

    • hogmomma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      For work, I use Chrome, but only because Firefox’s profile management is (more or less) nonexistent. Once they have that, which I understand isn’t too far out, I’m ditching Chrome entirely.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Their user share was pretty okay for a while, but bombed when Chrome first released because it was much more performant. Unfortunately, that stigma never quite fell off and they lost a huge opportunity to overtake the market.

      • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        How was it more performant? As I remember it, Chrome was loading websites not noticeably faster than Firefox, as website loading speed depended and still depends mainly on your internet connection and hardware anyway.

        As I remember it, Chrome exploded because it was pushed onto users at every possible opportunity while Firefox depended (and still depends) on users actively looking for it.

        Used Google or Google products? Get ads for Chrome. Wanted to download Google Earth? You had to activly uncheck a box such that Chrome wasn’t going to be installed as well. Meanwhile no ads and not the same amount of exposure for Firefox.

        That way they achieved a critical mass and snowballing did the rest. There were so many users using it that it was considered a good choice just because it was used by many people.

        Regarding the performance aspect, if there even was a noticeable difference, it was worse than Firefox. Where else did the “Chrome eating RAM” memes come from?

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          I was a Firefox user at the time, using adblockers, and the swap was a huge improvement to my browsing experience. I can’t even remember all the ways, since this was a decade ago. But at the time, Firefox was in a lul.

          Things likely swapped pretty fast, but I wasn’t aware of it at the time because I was already using Chrome.

          No ads swayed me, no Google specific sites, it wasn’t side loaded with anything.

          The Chrome eating ram memes came much later, after the enshitification process reached the third step. You seem to be compressing the entirety of both browsers into a single moment, and that’s not really how time works.

          • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            I understand that you made such an experience, but I can’t share it though. I’ve been a Firefox user for almost as long as Firefox exists, which is almost two decades. (I think I joined somewhere between 2005-2007). I’ve tried other browsers, sometimes I had to. However, I didn’t notice any benefits compared to Firefox. Especially not in performance. Even though benchmarks have always shown clear differences, they weren’t significant enough for me to consider switching, as the difference really didn’t impact my browsing experience.

            Regarding the memes: That was just a random annectode which I found suitable here. I don’t claim it has been that way since the beginning. (Can’t relate to that anyway.) But given that it has been around for a while, I don’t see how performance can be an argument in favour of Chrome in this.

        • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          I think you are misremembering. Chrome won at the start because it was fast as fuck and Firefox was not. Firefox caught back up in the 2016 time frame iirc and they’ve been back and forth ever since.

          Ironically chrome was named so as a goal was to reduce the chrome of the UI and focus on the web content, something recent versions of chrome and Firefox have abandoned in favor of massive swaths of whitespace and giant chrome buttons (on Firefox you can enable “unsupported” compact mode to reclaim some of the space if you’re on a laptop)

          • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            I’ve been a loyal Firefox user for almost as long as Firefox has existed. So I’m probably a bit biased. However, when I used other browsers, and if it wes just to try them out, I didn’t notice any benefits in terms of loading websites and executing their scripts. This includes Chrome. In benchmarks there are obviously differences visible, but to me as a user they didn’t matter. I wasn’t so short on time that I needed those microseconds. So I really don’t get how performance could be an argument in this.

        • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          I just remember Firefox around that time and for like over a decade just felt bloated and super slow in comparison. No idea if it’s better these days or what.

          • InternetPerson@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            I’d say give it a try and see for yourself.

            I can just recommend using Firefox for a multitude of reasons. However, I am biased as I have been using firefox for almost two decades and did not have many reasons to complain.

    • llama@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      They messed up 10 years ago when for some reason it took ages for Firefox to load compared to Chrome, and sadly it never really recovered the user base even though the performance is vastly improved.

      • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        To be fair, even in 2006 the Mozilla corporation was never going to outspend Firefox

        Especially not given how much Mozilla wastes on executive compensation ;)

  • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    So maybe my experience is unique but websites don’t always test with Firefox now and some simply don’t work with it. I use it anyway out of principle but occasionally I need to open Chrome.

    On mobile it’s even worse. Firefox is stuttery on my Pixel 8 Pro and doesn’t handle more than ~20 open tabs well. The nightly version fixes the stutter but crashes all the time (it’s a nightly build after all so this is expected).

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      This is just straight-up slander. I’ve been using Firefox since 1.0PR (so for 20 years now). It was a very rare occasion when a website wouldn’t function properly, and almost never would a website completely break. I haven’t had a single issue with a website in Firefox for over 5 years now. I would appreciate it if you could post some examples of some websites that “simply won’t work with it”, because I simply don’t believe you.

      Mobile is fine too. I have a bad habit of not closing tabs. It’s gotten so bad that the tab count number is just the infinity symbol on my phone. Still don’t have any slowdown issues on a Fold 3. Didn’t have any on my OnePlus 6T, either, nor my LG G2, nor my Galaxy S3. Quit making shit up just to have an excuse to stick with a shitty browser.

      • MentorKitten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        I often have to use edge or chrome to do most if anything related to my classes or for pearson. Almost never wants to work on Firefox

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Ah yes, anything institutional or governmental tends to behind on the times when it comes to browser compatibility. Good point.

          I remember back when I tried to get assistance from my local government; the application form didn’t work unless you had IE6 (a browser that hasn’t been supported since Windows XP), in 2012.

  • egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    It’s weird that I’ve been on firefox for the vast majority of my life and I always had this perception that “everyone” was using it. Here in lemmy you hear about it all the time, my friends use it, I see it on my newsfeeds etc

    But when you check the market share it around 2.8% while chrome is 65.1% https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share

    • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I remember a point around 2015ish where a lot of web apps went from recommending Firefox and Chrome for the best experience to just Chrome. Now I often see “don’t use Firefox” as a support tactic.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Might have to do with the fact that Firefox was the dominant browser for quite awhile until Chrome arrived on the scene.

      • ahal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Iirc it peaked at around 30% market share. I think IE was around 60% at the time. So never dominant, but definitely very very widespread.

    • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I was at my parents house last week because i had to help them with their laptop. I told my mom about firefox and she was very confused because she doesn’t seem to understand that google chrome is a browser and that every browser can access google search or their banking site.

      It took a bit of effort to explain that firefox works the exact same but is safer and faster.

      She is now using firefox on her phone because i showed her ublock origin works with it to block ads.

      A lot of people don’t seem to understand that google chrome isn’t the internet and what exactly a browser is.

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        I feel like “most people” only learn “one technology per category”. They know of, one operative system, one browser, one app to mindless scroll, one program to edit text. As a developer it shocks me a little because I’m always eager to try new programming languages, technologies and ways to interact with things. I guess most people only know about edge/safari because they come pre-installed

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          How is that shocking?

          I use Linux, Firefox, Lemmy, nano. Why would I change?

      • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        A lot of people don’t seem to understand that google chrome isn’t the internet and what exactly a browser is.

        It’s been that way for a lot longer than chrome has been the big one, it used to be the same with internet explorer…

    • Juigi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I guess average user cares mostly about how fast and smooth the browsing is. Chrome definitely has the edge on that over firefox.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        I’m forced to use Chrome quite a bit (workplace silliness) and exclusively use Firefox at home. I seriously cannot see this edge that you claim Chrome has. Do you mean in loading speed? Scrolling speed?

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    it’s all inevitable. client signatures, the end of privacy, jerking off on my way home from the office. there is no God

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    As with others, I use Firefox for my main browser, and Brave when I need a Chromium-based browser for something. I don’t see many ads…

    • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Consider ungoogled chromium instead. Brave is not great, it just has the advantage of being heavily promoted by the middle part of the (privacy nerds) and (want privacy because their beliefs are rejected by most of human society) venn diagram.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        I use that on my personal computer, but at work I’ll occasionally hit sites other than what I’m debugging, and Chromium has ineffective ad-block, whereas Brave has reasonable ad-block. I can’t control the network at work like I can at home, so I can’t really rely on something like a pi-hole or whatever.

        As a web browser with an embedded ad-blocker, it works fine. I’m not going to stop using something because someone distasteful is using it, I’ll stop using it if it no longer meets my needs. It blocks ads and renders as Chrome would, so it works well enough for me.

        I disable the crypto nonsense and pretty much only use it for debugging work stuff. Sometimes that means I need a JSON formatter or something, and those sites are riddled with ads w/o an ad-blocker.

        • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          oh, hrm. Im not sure what specific build you’re using, but the one I’m using has mechanisms for installing normal adblockers like ublockorigin. note: afaik, this doesn’t solve the problem indicated in this thread – I’m operating on the basis that the blocking functionality will be nerfed. However for me, I use it purely for (stuff that doesnt work in firefox) and my jellyfin server (since firefox is kinda particular about hevc videos…you can kinda get them to work in windows, but in many cases I dont fully understand jellyfin still tries to transcode to 264).

          worth stating that “because someone distasteful is using it” is a reasonable misunderstanding due to me assuming some knowledge. Brave was created because firefox kicked a homophobe out and he wanted to make a browser. Said person is also clearly a cryptonut, which makes him a yet more negative person in my book. Now, unrelated to that base, you have a lot of people out there who are promoting it by my personal experience in more privacy centric groups is that these promoters are often quite…unsavory. Is that enough to stop using software? not necessarily. Is it enough when there are far better options out there? to me, absolutely.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 days ago

            At home, it’s whatever ships with my Linux distribution. I use it mostly for web dev testing (I dev on Firefox, test on chromium) for personal projects, and for my kids to play certain games (Firefox works most of the time for that).

            Brave was created because firefox kicked a homophobe out and he wanted to make a browser.

            Sort of, but I don’t think that’s really telling the whole story.

            Brendan Eich was the CEO of Mozilla for many years and was the initial creator of JavaScript. He was ousted because he made a private donation to block gay marriage legalization in California. There is no evidence that he was or is a homophobe, just that he didn’t believe that gay marriage was something that state should legally recognize. By all counts, he was pleasant to work with regardless of sexual orientation, the issue was that someone found out about his donation. He didn’t harm anyone and wasn’t unfair, he just made a private donation.

            I think he was a great CEO, and Mozilla needs a technical CEO imo (in fact, everything started going downhill around when he left). I disagree with him politically, but if I avoided every product where I disagreed with the executive team politically, I’d have to avoid pretty much every product (and quit my job).

            So I need a better reason to avoid Brave. I’m not sure what the plan is for their cryptocurrency, and I honestly see it as more of a gimmick than anything. It’s easy to disable, so whatever, it existing doesn’t impact me.

            I also don’t actively recommend it to anyone, I always recommend Firefox or a Firefox derivative. The only time I recommend it is if someone needs a Chromium-based browser and wants ad-blocking, and Brave works well for that. If they just need Chromium and don’t need ad blocking, I recommend Chromium.

            If you have a better alternative, I’m interested. I literally just need a Chromium-based browser that works on macOS (what I use for work) with proper ad blocking. I don’t need to sync anything, it’ll only ever exist on that one device. I also need something for Linux, and open source is more important than ad blocking there.

            I’m also interested in Brave Search since it uses its own index. I currently use DDG, but search results are kinda crappy so I’m looking for alternatives.

  • kyle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    To my shame, I’m still deeply ingrained in the Google ecosystem. I settled on it like 8-10 years ago and I’m not sure how to dig myself out of this pit. More than Chrome, I heavily use Docs, Sheets, Drive, Wallet, YouTube, Gmail, I even have a Pixel (I hate how bloated Samsung is).

    I’ve used Firefox a little for work because of the nice containers feature. Is Google Drive bad too? It’s so easy to share things, I torrent a lot of books and I’ve shared with a bunch of friends, idk if there’s an alternative that others could easily use.

  • tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    I use Firefox everywhere which means I have ads blocking everywhere, including and especially on Android. All my tabs are synced and are easily transferred between devices.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      If we want to be honest, Firefox on Android has way worse performance than Chrome.

      (But I still use it instead of Chrome)

      • tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        It depends I think. I found Chrome to be a tiny bit faster but then ads bogged the page down so most of the time, Firefox is faster for me.

        In some very rare cases when I need to disable ads blocking, Chrome is indeed faster but I’d rather abandon websites rather than disable ads blocking.

        So if you love ads, Chrome is better. If you hate ads like I do, Firefox is miles ahead.

        • JWBananas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          There are other ways to block ads. Adguard does a great job on Android. It establishes a local VPN, so it can do HTTP[S] content filtering in addition to DNS blocking.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            Can’t use my VPN and adguard at the same time iirc, unless android has two active VPN “slots” now. Can’t bring a pihole with me 24/7 either as much as I would like to.

                • Cyberpunk3000@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  Yes because there is no need to setup another VPN. You only configure the DNS settings (Private DNS). I know that Mullvad on PC has an option to use custom DNS server