• BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m a 2A Loving Republican getting my Guns ready in case the Government gets TOO BIG and I HATE the idea of Term Limits. We need LIFETIME APPOINTMENTS in ALL Parts of the Government with NO WAY to recall or otherwise Punish people who are Corrupt!

  • vin@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Would have been nice to add insider trading by anyone in government to this list

  • bquintb@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This has been a long time coming. here’s hoping the US gives Kamala a blue Congress so we can enact these changes.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Good. We needed to hear this. How much can be done, we shall see, but a plan is a great starting point.

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t get the appointing of a new judge every two years for 18 years. Does that mean that the courts are gonna like fill up with a bunch of justices or is it just every two years you can replace an empty seat?

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Still 9 justices. The justices would have an 18-year term limit, so one seat opens and is then filled every two years.

  • teamevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Vote but I think it would be absolutely brilliant if Biden uses the immunity to arrest and remove every single person trying to strip our country away. Lock up every last one, including any corrupt judges.

    • havocpants@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If I understood the ruling correctly, that “immunity” is the supreme court saying the president is immune for “official acts” - and they get to decide what those are. This is not immunity for Biden, it’s a fascist coup happening in slow motion.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think it would be absolutely brilliant if Biden uses the immunity to arrest and remove

      He’s not doing this and people need to stop wish-casting that he would in order to cope with the party’s refusal to oppose Republican policy.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m still voting for Biden. He’s still my favorite write-in candidate for November. Make wish-casting great again. /s

      • troybot [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        If Democrats follow that playbook it only legitimizes it, giving a future Republican administration the green light to do it as well.

        The correct response is what we’re seeing from Biden today. Put it down on paper and get it on record who really supports the rule of law

        • theparadox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          If Democrats follow that playbook it only legitimizes it, giving a future Republican administration the green light to do it as well.

          I 100% agree in spirit. However…

          giving a future Republican administration the green light to do it

          One of the many problems with American politics is that the Republicans do not need legitimacy or a green light. They’ll fucking do it anyway. They’ll also cry foul if they catch a whiff of a democrat thinking about doing it. Or they’ll just accuse a democrat of doing it and they’ll just use that as justification for doing it first.

          They know their policies are wildly unpopular and that they won’t even be able to maintain power by illegitimate minority rule, which they have been doing for decades now.

          It’s grab power now or regroup and accept that they’ve lost the culture war. They are not going to go quietly, as recent events and Project 2025 has made crystal clear.

  • zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Step 1) Executive order that appoints fake judges to the supreme Court, bypass Congress by ordering the executive branch to treat the judges as legitimate.

    There is no step 2.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    it’s a testament to how corrupt the court has gotten that just four years ago public sentiment was steadfastly against reforming the court.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It also seems to be a testament to how nothing (barring term-limits) is gonna be done. The previous laws and regulations were perfectly adequate until the supreme court ruled “uh-uh.” There still seems to be a perceptual disconnect between those not playing fairly and the Democratic establishment.

    • Delusional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      And that’s how much damage one lunatic republican can do when in office. Four more years of it without some kind of safety net in place will destroy the country as we know it. Thanks for ruining everything good republicans!

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you think the issue lies in one bombastic and opportunistic president, and not our deity-like elevation of these lifetime-appointed robed clerics who are the only ones we entrust to interpret the constitution as if they have some divine patriotism, then you have been oriented by the democratic party away from what would otherwise be discontentment with the political system, and instead against the republican party which, as it just so happens, makes you fall in line with the democratic party and their fundraising strategies. The democrats desperately want you to ignore the gaping insecurities, volatility, and exploitation in our political system and instead instill a fear of Republicans.

        Trump merely saw how easy it’d be to capture our judicial system that was devised by 20 year old white slavers only 4 generations ago. He correctly identified how the Supreme law of the land is all based on a flimsy interpretation of the honor system: we appoint justices for life and basically just trust them to play nice for their entire tenure without provisions to deal with judicial capture. It’s honestly a miracle we’ve gotten this far without more judges being captured.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Trump merely saw how easy it’d be to capture our judicial system that was devised by 20 year old white slavers only 4 generations ago.

          Still notice how much smarter were those 20 years old white slavers than most of today’s 40 years olds. They’ve actually designed something that works.

  • credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This whole “every two years” new justice thing is really bothering me. Did he say that or is the journalist taking liberties?

    I wonder because that timing will fly straight out the window the minute someone retires early or dies. Does the next Justice get a shorter term? A longer one? Does the seat go empty for a time? Do we end up having cycles of presidencies that get to appoint 3 or 4 justices in one term?

    Bah- this will keep me up tonight, I just know it.

    • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I imagine it will be the seat itself is reappointed on a fixed schedule, that would function most similarly to the Presidency or Congress. The replacement be more or less an “acting” Justice to finish the term.

    • criitz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Every 2 years the longest-standing justice would be replaced, if they have served at least 18 years. Since there are nine justices this means each will get an 18 year term exactly. Any early exits would just mean you skip the next cycle. That’s how I’d imagine it anyway.

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I saw someone mentioned that if something happened and a seat was vacated early, one of the justices whose term had expired could be brought in to serve in that seat until it is filled with a new person at the next scheduled time. But that seems to mean that some other justice(s) more senior than the one who vacated might wind up serving more than the normal 18 years as they wouldn’t be replaced until the next cycle.

      As far as a president getting to appoint 3 justices in one term, we just had that with trump. IMO there really should be more than just 9 seats. A common suggestion is 13, one for each District.

    • Senokir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not sure what the solution would be that is proposed by the legal experts but it seems to me that we already have a system for dealing with that for the office of the president in the form of vice presidents etc taking over if they die. Not that you should have to have an entire chain of people ready to take over for every SC justice but rather, if one dies or retires or whatever before their 18 years is up then a replacement can be appointed to finish the remainder of their term.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t even know why we need specific appointments for the seats. Just rotate judges from the lower courts through.

    • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      What exactly would you like the Democrats to do? What’s your grand plan? They have to work within the law, even though the SC is clearly not. You ever read Alan Moore’s, The Killing Joke? We have to show them our way works. At least for now.

    • noride@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I hope you’re sitting down for this one because it’s quite shocking; things ammend to the Constitution become a part of the constitution itself, and thus constitutional.

      • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Bro, they already ruled Trump a king which the constitution also says isn’t possible. They don’t care what it says.

  • yourgodlucifer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Who would enforce the code of conduct on the supreme court would they have to be charged by a lower court? Or would it be congress or the president?

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If this doesn’t pass, Biden should declare martial law until it does. He has the power, and he needs to use that power so that can lose that power. It needs to be dropped for future presidents, Democrat or Republican.

  • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ha. Good luck with that, seeing as it’ll be the supreme court ruling on the constitutionality of any law that’s passed. In short it’ll take a constitutional amendment to do anything, and that’s not happening in this political climate