Those Silicon Valley geniuses have done it again!

Next week- “it’s like the subway, but with AI!”

  • ribhu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait they didn’t have them in the US? We’ve had uber shuttles for years in India

    • insaan@leftopia.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If you click the article link, then use a process called “reading”, you would see:

      The company has already launched similar services abroad in Egypt, Nigeria, and India. Now it’s bringing the concept to the United States.

      Edit: I misunderstood and assumed he hadn’t read the article, which is entirely too common these days.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          What if you, the customer, are a poor person? Is Uber going to subsidize a bus pass for you to charter one of Uber’s buses to their job?

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            From my own experience, if you’re poor, you use a regular bus. If you want to get somewhere faster, you pay more and catch a shuttle. If you want comfort, you pay even more and get a taxi. And all modes of transport are always full to the brim. The more the merrier, always.

            • TheFriar@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              But…that’s our point. Uber taking over bus routes would ultimately void that choice. Public transportation is a public service. Letting a VC-funded for-profit company weasel their way into that space is never going to not fuck poor people. It’ll fuck everyone, but it’ll make “public transportation” unaffordable. And, really, when you’re poor, “if you want to get somewhere faster” isn’t really an option. That’s…the thing with being poor. You don’t have the extra money to spend to catch a shuttle and you don’t have the luxury of paying for comfort. Not to mention, even in the best case scenario, where busses would keep their existing schedule and routes (though the likelihood of this happening is slim) and we’d just get more busses? It’d clog the system, ultimately slowing bus routes.

              So, no. Not “the more the merrier” when it comes to private companies elbowing their way into public service, and especially not when we’re talking about fuckin traffic.

                • TheFriar@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Like where? Kids school lunches? Oh, no…wait…a bunch of literal children have school lunch debt. Well, maybe family visits for prisoners? Oh, no, they’ve now barred people from visiting inmates and a private company now forces them to pay to do a shitty video chat. Okay, well maybe the American healthcare system? Nope. I guess that one’s killing a whole bunch of people and drowning families in debt for simple procedures and charging people $80 for a Tylenol and charging mothers for letting them hold their own fucking child.

                  I’m sure there’s a great example where a private company is doling out their services at a loss as a public good, right?

                • MxM111@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Why? Most of our businesses are private. The stores you go are private, the taxi you take are private, the cinema, the airlines, hell even electric and water companies are private. What so special about Uber that it has to be publicly owned? We do have public busses, this will be on top of that.

  • casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Do people consider shuttles and buses the same thing? Because this sounds like a shuttle, which as far as I’m aware is completely different from a bus. I take a shuttle to the airport, which requires a reservation and ~$50 whereas I take a bus to get around town and it’s typically free.

    Essentially it sounds like they are trying to dip into the shuttle market, not the inner-city bus market. Though maybe both?

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is what happens when you believe the private sector is the answer to everything. We reinvent the wheel one hundred times, and each time its more square than before.