• SeekPie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Oh no, please no.

    Will uBlock still work or will that also break when/if this gets added?

    • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      As I understood the ad will be a part of the actual video file you receive but, unlike fixed sponsor integrations, the time it’s shown at will change every time. That is going to be impossible to get rid of without AI unless there are some exploits

      • EisFrei@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        They will also want to block people from skipping the ad. So they’ll have to provide timestamps, when skipping should be blocked. Maybe those can be somehow extracted.

      • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        I doubt it’ll be impossible as Google will be required by many laws around the world to make it clear if something is an advert, especially in the EU. So there will be a mechanism to know if something in the stream is an advert or not.

        Adblockers should be able to adapt but I do think SponsorBlock might be stuffed if users are seeing adverts at different times in the stream.

      • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        I guess thats what we will have to do. The cats catching up but the mouse will continue to inovate.

          • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            Whata ur problem with ai? I dont get the hatred. We need good foss models otherwise proprietary crap wins.

              • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                Energy usage isnt bad its literally what makes shit happen. Hallucinations yeah but its getting better, what does enforcement mean?

                • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  Energy usage of AI models is at least 100x higher than other ways of doing most of the tasks (such as calculations and searches), hallucinations will never disappear and enforcement means inability to disable the AI or use most of the features with it being disabled

                  • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    15 days ago

                    I’d argue its a tradeoff for efficiency. Hallucinations are getting better its already better than the average human especially with tool use, self checking and chain of thought. And the whole enforcement thing I’ve never had that issue sounds like something is only run into on proprietary software and well thats a cluster fuck anyways.

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Legally, YouTube has to tell you you’re watching an ad. This means that at least visually somewhere (it could be baked into the video stream, for example), there should be a distinctive pattern that extensions should be able to grab and make the video fast-forward.

      • sandalbucket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        If youtube manages to stop fast forwarding, maybe at the very least we could auto-mute, and maybe overlay photos of puppies or something

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Bad idea. People would get a negative Pavlovian reaction to puppies after a while.

          Imagine walking down the street, seeing a puppy and immediately getting annoyed! That’s no way to live, man! 😄