• shasta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Unless the code in car thing exposes vulnerabilities or potential exploits in Spotify. Even the potential exposure may not be worth the risk to them.

      • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        my money is on Spotify violating licensed open-source code in Car Thing, which would be revealed if they open-sourced their code.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      People underestimate how much work open sourcing something acrually is. Not trying to defend Spotify, fuck Spotify, but open sourcing something isn’t free.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The code may contain some proprietary things they want to remove. Maybe it’s not up to public standards and they don’t want to be looked down upon. Maybe it could reveal vulnerabilities in other code if not cleaned up.

          There could be a lot of reasons.

    • hardaysknight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe they don’t have 100% of the rights to the hardware in order to open source it? I don’t think they made this hardware in house. They would have had to outsource it.