• Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The argument is basically that it does too much and as the motto of Unix was basically “make it do 1 thing and that very well”, systemd goes against that idea.

      You might think it is silly because what is the issue with it doing many things. Arguably, it harms customization and adaptability, as you can’t run only 2/3 of systemd with 1/3 being replaced with that super specific optimisation for your specific use case. Additional, again arguably, it apparently makes it harder to make it secure as it has a bigger attack surface.

              • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                At a high level, microkernels push as much as possible into userspace, and monolithic kernels keep drivers in kernel space

                There are arguments for each e.g. a buggy driver can’t write into the memory space of another driver as easily in a micro kernel, however it’s running in the same security level as userspace code. People will make arguments for both sides of which is more secure

                Monolithic kernels also tended to be more performant at the time, as you didn’t have to context switch between ring 0 and ring 1 in the CPU to perform driver calls - we also regularly share memory directly between drivers

                These days pretty much all kernels have moved to a hybrid kernel, as neither a truly monolithic kernel nor a truly micro kernel works outside of theoretical debates

  • Lightfire228@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I feel like the people who complain about systemd have never tried to mess with sysVinit scripts before

    6+ years ago, I was trying to configure a touchscreen HAT for a raspberry pi, and dicking with the init.rc script was a massive pain

    • Meansalladknifehands@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The alternatives to systemd isn’t init.d or some other legacy init systems. I use runit, pretty easy to understand and use. Stop being lazy dude