• wirelesswire@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The article states that the PS5 is responsible for significantly more gaming hours, so a large number of PS4 users are likely mainly using their device for streaming or similar. Hell, I still have my PS2 and 3 in my closet since they’re my only dvd and blu ray players.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      the PS5 also has reletively low game ownership rate, so the hours on PS5 are either games given for free/part of subscription, or free to play.

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No wonder either, there are strangely few games meant just for the new system, and it’s been out for several years.

  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I really don’t regret buying my ps5, but I could totally still be on ps4 as I’m mostly playing games from the previous generation or available on it.

    But at one point, there’ll be quite a few games which wouldn’t be able to run on ps4. The question is when.

    I also feel like we don’t need to have more beautiful games than Last of Us 2, so I hope one day we’ll stop focusing so much on better looking games.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I also feel like we don’t need to have more beautiful games than Last of Us 2

      Remember when FarCry was released, and people were compairing the ingame screenshots with real photos? We all thought “Man, this is it. It can’t get any better than this”.

      • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well I’m not against games becoming more impressive visually per se, but against the fact that because of this games are becoming way more expensive to produce and companies are now risk averse.

        But yeah I might have said « this is it » in front of quite a few games 😅

  • scripthook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just recently bought a PS4 for $150. So being able to play most modern games (with the exception of any new games 2025 or later) is a pretty good deal :)

  • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    PS2 and PS3 get use. PS4 had nothing that interested me. PS5, same. Maybe when something good comes out ill get a PS17

  • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If any of you guys have a PS4 lying around gathering dust, consider jailbreaking it. Depending on the firmware, it is pretty easy to do and opens up a lot of possibilities. Surely better than being neglected :)

    Edit: Firmwares up to 11.00 are jailbreakable as of recently. 11.00 is from around late 2022, so if you have a console that hasn’t been in use since then, there’s a good chance you can jailbreak it. Base model, Slim, or Pro - doesn’t matter

      • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well, obviously piracy if you’re into that. Apart from that, using cheats for games, dumping your physical games and having a permanent copy you can use without the CD and an active license (probably possible with a digital game too I assume? not sure), applying patches like a 60fps patch for Bloodborne, emulation of PS1, PS2, PSP and a bunch of other consoles etc etc.

        Running Linux if you’re that kind of person :P