• ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The question is if their remote disable will be triggered before the US blows the factory up anyway.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You know what doesn’t convince people to rethink how they view America, or empire?

        Arbitrarily inserting comments like that into topics where they’re disconnected and off topic.

        Wait a minute…are you a DoD contractor whose mission it is to make any critic of America look whiney and detached from reality?

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    i assume by disable they probably mean, something along the lines of irreversibly contaminating the whole of the assembly line.

    I’d be curious to know how specifically they’re going about this.

  • corroded@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is a good thing, but it’s hardly unique. Any advanced manufacturing facility will have remote access to their equipment in case an operator needs reconfigure it, transfer data, or in this case if they’re invaded by Lesser Taiwan.