• Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Many won’t like it, but this is the reason we need competition like Epic games and GOG.

    The steam fanboys certainly aren’t going to make this problem any better.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Bad competition is still better than no competition, because of the aforementioned issue.

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yeah, but fair competition? EGS paying publishers to have exclusives doesn’t seem like fair competition to me.

      • Spedwell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        EGS can’t compete on features for sure (it really is quite a shit platform), but they would be very competitive if their 12% fee (vs. Steams 30% fee) could be passed to buyers as lower prices. As it stands, Valve’s policies essentially strongarms the market to prohibit this (publishers selling on Steam may not have a lower price on a different platform, or the game can be de-listed from Steam). The Wolfire v. Valve case is highly relevent here.

        My plea is for you not to get mad at Epic for being shit. We should be accepting of crappy platforms if their fees reflect that (Epic charges 40% what Steam does). Focus your frustration at Valve for preventing the market from fairly allowing you select the quality of the platform you’d like to pay for.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Competition like gog, I’m all for it. But what is epic providing? I fail to see it.