Just randomly sharing my experience here. My sister told me a few weeks ago she was going to change for a new phone (a Motorola, she likes AOSP-like experience). I noticed that her new phone wouldn’t get a jack.

“Yeah, I know, I hope I can make it work with a USB-adapter”. She has nice headphones that she likes to use, so USB-C earplugs were not an option.

Fast forward to today, she told me the adapter she got starts to malfunction:

  • she has to twitch the jack in the adapter for the thing to work
  • when she plugs the adapter in, Google Assistant takes over and randomly starts skipping songs.

She’s now considering getting wireless earbuds, but she’s not a fan of having to recharge them to be able to use them, and is also cautious about the e-waste potential.

I have a Moto G84 which does the job. It’s not the best phone in the world, I’m eyeing a flagship from time to time and keep the G84 as a “connected walkman”, but would it break today, I would probably get a G55 (https://www.notebookcheck.net/Motorola-Moto-G55-smartphone-review-Inexpensive-doesn-t-have-to-be-boring.932900.0.html)

That’s it for me, do you have similar experiences to share?

  • lurklurk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I just keep buying phones with headphone jacks. I use bluetooth headphones too, but have a wired set for fallback, especially when travelling.

    Also, if you’re on a call or vc, a good wired set wth a well placed mike on the wire (e.g. marshall mode) gives you better sound quality and better exclusion of environment noise than any bluetooth headphones, and you don’t have to worry about earbud batteries running out mid call.

    It limits phone selection a lot, but so far there has been good phones with headphone jacks every time

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    A “must”, only for a subset of users.

    If it were truly a “must”, more people would be complaining.

    I get it, you find Bluetooth unappealing for reasons, just like I find larger phones unappealing. Unfortunately, we’re a minority, neither of these are a “must” for most people.

    • ISOmorph@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      It’s unappealing because it makes you extremely easy to track. So options without bluetooth are a safeguard for your privacy, which is a human right that has been heavily under attack for years. So in that regard headphone jacks are an objective must. Not enough people are complaining, true, but that’s because they don’t understand the technology and the risks are being obfuscated to them.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I was dead against losing my 3.5mm jack, and tried to use a USB-to-3.5mm adaptor but it was poor, with issues like your sister experienced.

    I finally decided to try a set of relatively cheap earplugs and I wish I’d done it sooner. They’re lightweight, have good connectivity and a convenient charging case. I’m getting better quality audio and experience than I was with my 3.5mm jack - i’d have to replace my headsets every year or less as the wires got damaged over time, and the audio quality is actually better with my bluetooth earplugs. I used to avoid bluetooth after bad experiences over the years with audio drop out and connection issues, but I’ve not had any problems with my newer devices.

    I’m not pretending they are audiophile quality but neither is 3.5mm audio in a phone - they just don’t have good quality DACs in phones. Bluetooth is finally a decent and convenient step up for me for day-to-day use and I’m finally not as bothered about losing my 3.5mm port. It’s also worth noting that if you want better audio, you can get bluetooth DACs and plug wired audio into those for an even better experience - I’m tempted but it’s expensive and I’m not sure I’d appreciate the benefit enough to make it worthwhile for me.

  • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I initially held on to the headphone jack but nowadays I’ve completely stopped caring. My Galaxy Buds 2 Pros are pretty dang good even by audiophile standards and the convenience of TWS is quite nice. For my wired IEMs the 9$ Apple dongle works just fine with my Galaxy S24+. Nowadays some IEMS also have USB-C version and I suspect that this trend will continue. Like it or not that jack will eventually become a thing of the past on the vast majority of consumer electronics, not just on phones.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I basically don’t notice that I don’t have a headphone jack. My usb-c adapter is just permanently affixed to my wired IEMs and it basically makes no difference to me if the plug is round or usb-c shaped.

    I definitely recommend biting the bullet and getting a good adapter. Since I have a pixel I use the Google one. I made sure my partner got an official apple one for their iPhone since I remember seeing rumors about a volume difference between them if mixed and matched. Aside from Apple shenanigans I haven’t really had an issue with them. I also only charge at night so I never have the problem of needing to charge and listen at the same time.

  • Tabooki@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    A good quality DAC connected to your USB port will give you far better sound than having a headphone jack.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      The jack is for convenience while you’re mobile. I have a good collection of really decent iems and use them all the time when I’m not worried about the cable snagging on something. At work I use BT, it’s okay but not great. But yeah, for my uses, a headphone jack is a must.

    • Bobby@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      A good quality DAC connected to your USB port will give you far better sound than having a headphone jack.

      Nobody’s advocating for taking the USB-C port away.

      • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        You didn’t know? You can’t have Bluetooth, a USBC port and a headphone jack at the same time. You gotta pick 2 of the 3

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    No not it is not a must. And the vast majority of pwope don’t care.

    • ahal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      After experiencing true wireless ear buds, I’m never going back. Yeah no thanks, I don’t want to be literally tethered to my phone.

      • Tabooki@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Bluetooth can’t even transport mp3 quality. Let alone CD or even HD quality music.

        • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Of course it is possible, but it is an inefficient use of internal phone space. It adds another physical failure point. Increases risk of water entry. And adds construction/repair cost.

          All for some thing few care about already and that number gets smaller everyday.

          Sorry to be harshly pragmatic about it (I have a few niche hobbies myself) but it’s time to let it go.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            it is an inefficient use of internal phone space.

            It is only inefficient for you. I never use the selfie camera. Should I be campaigning for its removal?

            It adds another physical failure point.

            As you don’t use it, you don’t care if it fails.

            Increases risk of water entry.

            No. This is a solved problem.

            And adds construction costs

            More so for the selfie camera.

            and repair cost.

            If you don’t use it, you don’t need it repairing

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I still have been able to play games on my phone with truly wireless earbuds because the latency is awful. I’d love to have an option to plug in.

          • Albbi@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Google pixel 6 Pro with Google Buds Pro. Not really cheaped out but no aptx on the earbuds. I assumed low latency codec would be there when I bought a pro version of an earbud from a company that removes their headphone jack, but noooooooo.

      • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        You don’t have to go back. You can have both. A headphone jack does not preclude the use of Bluetooth.

  • Thassodar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Regarding your sister’s issue: that happened to me less when I paid a little more for a quality adapter. I think I got a two pack for $15 and the cord has some rubber protection where the wire turns into USB C and where it turns into a headphone jack. Haven’t had the same issue your sister is having ever since.

  • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I actually quite like the Bluetooth DAC I got because of the disappearance of my headphone jack. It breaks that physical attachment of my headphones to my phone while giving very good quality audio.

    I’d recommend checking out the Fiio BTR line if interested.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Flagship phones are crap IMO, my personal hatred for glass as a material used unnecessarily for the back is immense.
    Glass sucks in every aspect, it’s slippery, it’s heavier, it’s a finger print magnet, and it’s fragile in a place where you can choose synthetics that are better in every way.
    Losing the jack and SD cards suck too, and preventing replaceable batteries is so bad, it’s actually illegal in EU from 2027. I have no idea why that couldn’t have been sooner.

    https://www.euronews.com/green/2023/06/22/new-eu-law-to-force-smartphone-makers-to-build-easily-replaceable-batteries

    The rules will come into force in 2027.

    I’m so sick of this, that I’ve decided NO WAY I’m buying a flagship next time, despite I absolutely love features like an amazing camera and screen.

    But they can piss right off with their bullshit, pardon my French.
    I bet a manufacturer could get sales advertising that it’s NOT a glass back, and that it HAS mini-jack.
    But I also miss the notification LED, how did they figure it was a good idea to remove that too???

    The weird thing is they ALL do this shit? Where’s the competition on maintaining well established functions? A mini jack doesn’t prevent use of wireless earphones, but lack of it absolutely prevents the use of wired ones.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      A used flagship is a great phone (except for the glass nonsense, give me all plastic please). It’s all I buy, 2 or 3 year old flagship for 1/4 the price of new.

      I just upgraded from a 2017 flagship to a Pixel 5, for $120!

    • MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      There are some manufacturers that have kept these features and it’s definitely a selling point. The one I know is Sony but I think there was another one. I’m still sad they removed the notification led though, it seemed like they would keep it as they also kept the top bezel.

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    “USB-adapter” in this context used to be quite a shitshow.

    I’ve seen at least the bastardisations of the USB-c spec where manufacturers just repurpose a couple of pins for analog audio. One for samsung, one for Xiaomi etc.

    I hope most have gone over to being proper USB soundcards with a DAC today.

  • Blastboom Strice@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    About 4years ago, I decided to get a phone that I could modify (custom rom, root and such) and that had a proper camera. So I got a xiaomi mi 10, which has no audio jack (or even sd card reader…)

    The default adapter lasted about 3years (I dont use wired earphones that often) and I decided to get a “proper” one from a ugreen brand (I found reviews that their previous model was bad and they had released a new better one) (it’s this one UGreen AV161). It seems sturdy (it has that fiberglass sleeve too), hoping it will last.

    It’s indeed bad that they dont put a headphone jack and I find it sad that fairphone dropped it too, cuz I’m thinking of buying a phone from them in the future. Not only it reduces the phone’s usability, but also indirectly forces you to buy wireless earphones. On top of that, using wired earphones puts extra wear on the single usb port (which I dont know how easy it is to replace it, I’ve only replaced a micro-usb port).

    I dont exactly know where I’m going with this comment, but ok😅

    • Blaze@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Thanks for sharing the reference to that seemingly sturdy adapter, I’ll share it with my sister if she wants to give it a try.

    • zod000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      The extra wear on usb-c port is definitely still an issue as I have had that be the reason for needing to replace my wife’s phone twice now. It was worse with micro-usb in my experience, but it stopped me from making use of my usb-c dongles. BTW, if you’re using usb-c DACs, most kinda suck. Weirdly, I found the one from Google actually had the best sound, but if you haven’t had an issue thus far then don’t sweat it.

    • testman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      indirectly forces you to buy wireless earphones

      USB-C wired headphones exist

      edit: lol, replied too quickly. You mention wired headphones in the next sentence.

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    This is why I don’t like the idea of one device for all my communication and media needs. I have smartphones for comms and dedicated audio devices for music and podcasts, with headphone jacks.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Honestly the more I think about this the more I think that you are not only right, but putting all of our proverbial eggs in one basket with smartphones was a horrible horrible mistake. We have done too many trade-offs for convenience.

      Try to buy a digital camera today, pocket digital cameras basically aren’t made anymore. And even a mid-range pocket digital camera from the mid 2010s significantly outperforms a modern smartphone camera. It’s simple physics, bigger lens captures more light gives you a better picture.

      Try to listen to music. Almost all the digital music we are served up is lossy compressed for streaming. And then we feed it into Bluetooth headphones with even more lossy compression. The sound that actually goes in the ears sounds like crap and bears little resemblance to what the artist laid down on their master, but we’re all used to it so we think that’s what music is supposed to sound like. A late 1990s Discman has significantly better sound quality even with a cheap DAC.

      Try to do something online. A whole lot of new sites and services don’t even bother making a website, it’s just a promo to download their stupid privacy invading app. And if you want to do whatever you are doing on a real computer with a big screen, you’re SOL.

      And then there is the unintended effect on our kids. I have always been an advocate of mobile technology. But I am looking at the actual effect of growing up with smartphones and tablets, and the result is an awful lot of kids with attention spans measured in seconds rather than minutes. Kids who can edit video and insert images into a document with their eyes closed, but can barely write three coherent sentences.

      I have always been an advocate and user and enthusiast of smartphones and mobile technology. I buy this stuff, I use it, I recommend it to others.
      But I think maybe I was wrong. I think maybe we all were wrong.
      I look at the overall effect smartphones have on society, and I honestly can’t say the world is a better place as a result. We take crappy pictures, listen to crappy music, have crappy attention spans, but it’s all very convenient so we don’t care.

      I think maybe we were better off the other way. And maybe some of that inconvenience is a good thing, in the same way that having to do physical work is good exercise.

  • RandomStickman@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    For me I’m really split on wired vs wireless headphones as well. I do love how being wireless makes moving around easier. I’m sure we’ve all felt the rage when the wire gets caught and gets unplugged. But the amount of times I have to charge it while I want to use it is pretty annoying too.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      For me, nobody makes wireless over-ear headphones for people with giant skulls. I have broken headbands over time because they aren’t meant to go wide enough to actually fit on my head.

      IEMs aren’t really an option for me due to earwax (they either fall out, or the eartips degrade rapidly and I’m spending $20 every couple of months)

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Maybe. I tried the Bose equivalent (the Ultra Opens), the fit was fantastic but audio quality was absolute crap for the pricetag (returned after less than 5 minutes of use)

      • zod000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I am in no way trying to sell you on bluetooth headphones because I won’t use them either, but I imagine the Beyerdynamic Amiron Wireless or AudioTechnica ATH-M50xBT2 would fit your head. Neither are exactly something you’d walk around town in, I imagine.

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Funny enough, audio technica M50’s are one of the ones that broke 😅 the part just below the leather headband cracked and broke apart after about a year IIRC

          Had some Beyerdynamic dt 770s that broke just above the swivel hinge too.

          Currently using Sennheiser hd 58x jubilee, theyre holding up well and fit much better than the audio technicas.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I haven’t had a charging concern for Bluetooth for probably 10 years.

      Today, my ear buds have a case. If I use them for music for 8 hours, they tell me they need charging. That’s how much they’ve improved.

      The charging case rarely needs charging, and it supports wireless, so I just set it on the charging base.

  • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    The g84 is a great mid range phone with all the things that a phone should have, except for a decent camera.

    Being Motorola it has a couple of idiotic quirks that will never get fixed

    • kills Facebook messenger in the background no matter what your do.

    • on some but not all Australian 5g networks, the camera closes after a few seconds and is unusable unless you switch to 4g etc.

    I can live with those given the rest of the stuff is great for the price point.

    Rarely use headphones so can’t comment much on that side. FM radio seems to manage without.

    • Exec@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      on some but not all Australian 5g networks, the camera closes after a few seconds and is unusable unless you switch to 4g etc.

      The what? How?