• TehWorld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I disagree. They ARE pretty. Just not as pretty as a rose or a sunset and yeah best used as industrial tooling.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I would rate them above roses personally. Below a good sunset though; nearly nothing manmade beats those

      • TehWorld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Pedantry because funny: Diamonds and Roses aren’t man made either. On a more serious note, some things aren’t beautiful because they last but because they are fleeting.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Any rose you buy at a florist or other store is the product of centuries of selective breeding by horticulturists. So they are, in that sense, man-made. And now they’re getting into genetic modification.

          In fact, if you bought someone a dozen wild roses, they might be disappointed.

          Really, virtually anything plant-related you can buy in a store is a human creation at least in part. We don’t think of flowers we tend to grow and buy as domesticated, but they are.

      • froh42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Good sunsets are frequently man-made too, the most beautiful red glowing ones own their look to dust - air pollution.