DAITA: Defence Against AI-guided Traffic Analysis. Which one of these would consider to be the best option for privacy? I can’t have both on at the same time.

  • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    As a side note, I don’t know if I maybe have something configured wrong but is DAITA supposed to absolutely massacre your connection speed? I assumed it would be slower but my connection goes from ~190Mpbs to 3Mbps when I enable it.

    • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      on my phone it goes from 280 to less than 1, on pc from 700 to 400-ish which is acceptable. but idk what the heck happens on android, becomes unusable.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Only a few server support d a i t a, so if you enable it, your traffic is routing to a few servers on the entire planet. So it’s very slow

  • TheKaul@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I thought if you enable DAITA, you can either connect to a DAITA-Enabled server, or if you don’t, it’ll automatically multihop to a DAITA server. For speed I think you’d want to go straight for the DAITA but I’m fairly certain you can do both if multihopping is ideal.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    you can have both, you just might need to use something like qubes to encapsulate the traffic easily; Or use the socks5 proxies to do your own multihop proxying

    It’s down to your threat model: If someone is analyzing your local traffic the DAITA is valuable. If you want to obscure your geographical region then multi-hop is good.