„you are [insert bad person here]”
„why would you think that?”
„he speaks chinese. you speak chinese. he happens to be an asshole. you speak Chinese just like him, so therefore you are probably an asshole like him.”
I’ve never seen two commas before a statement and I’m confused from the get go
it’s polish quotation marks, i accidentally had the foreign keyboard.
not just polish. at least german too. not uncommon
Oh, gotcha! Thank you for the clarification
of course!
False syllogism (you speak Chinese, so you’re an asshole) or maybe premature generalization (some Chinese speakers are assholes, therefore all Chinese speakers are assholes).
Sounds like racist asshole logic. It’s not worth trying to communicate with them.
In addition to the others this is also an association fallacy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy
For example, a fallacious arguer may claim that “bears are animals, and bears are dangerous; therefore your dog, which is also an animal, must be dangerous.”
Dogs are dangerous though, that’s the thing. Cuteness overload is a real and serious condition! It’s the silent killer.
False equivalence, I’d say.
If A is the set containing c and d, and B is the set containing d and e, then since they both contain d, A and B are equal.
A categorical syllogism consists of three parts:
Major Premise
Minor premise
Conclusion/Consequent
Each part is a categorical proposition, and each categorical proposition contains two categorical terms.[13] In Aristotle, each of the premises is in the form “All S are P,” “Some S are P”, “No S are P” or “Some S are not P”, where “S” is the subject-term and “P” is the predicate-term:
“All S are P,” and “No S are P” are termed universal propositions;
“Some S are P” and “Some S are not P” are termed particular propositions.
More modern logicians allow some variation. Each of the premises has one term in common with the conclusion: in a major premise, this is the major term (i.e., the predicate of the conclusion); in a minor premise, this is the minor term (i.e., the subject of the conclusion). For example:
Major premise: All humans are mortal.
Minor premise: All Greeks are humans.
Conclusion/Consequent: All Greeks are mortal.
Each of the three distinct terms represents a category. From the example above, humans, mortal, and Greeks: mortal is the major term, and Greeks the minor term. The premises also have one term in common with each other, which is known as the middle term; in this example, humans. Both of the premises are universal, as is the conclusion.
Major premise: All mortals die.
Minor premise: All men are mortals.
Conclusion/Consequent: All men die.
Here, the major term is die, the minor term is men, and the middle term is mortals. Again, both premises are universal, hence so is the conclusion.
