Conspiracist Alex Jones has responded to his bankruptcy proceedings by urging viewers to spend money with his father’s company—which isn’t answerable to the Sandy Hook families.
He’s not transferring his assets or the assets of his company. He’s just urging people who would have bought products from him to buy products from his dad. I think that that’s legal.
I don’t think that “diverting assets”, which the article used, is the right term here.
Free Speech Systems is out of bankruptcy court now, though. The Sandy Hook plaintiffs asked the court to either change the bankruptcy from a reorganization to a liquidation or dismiss the case. The judge concluded it was in the best interests of everyone involved to dismiss it and allow the SH plaintiffs to move forward in state courts towards collecting.
Won’t the monitors catch that?
He’s not transferring his assets or the assets of his company. He’s just urging people who would have bought products from him to buy products from his dad. I think that that’s legal.
I don’t think that “diverting assets”, which the article used, is the right term here.
Free Speech Systems is out of bankruptcy court now, though. The Sandy Hook plaintiffs asked the court to either change the bankruptcy from a reorganization to a liquidation or dismiss the case. The judge concluded it was in the best interests of everyone involved to dismiss it and allow the SH plaintiffs to move forward in state courts towards collecting.