• scifun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Me too. Years ago I dabbled with Debian and Gentoo. Ubuntu was just up and coming then.

    Now I went from Mint to Fedora KDE to Fedora Silverblue (nuked my disk and removed windows)

    Gnome took a day to get used to but loving the workflow once I warmed up to it. Can’t believe how polished and rock solid the whole system is.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Gnome when you first use it feels like a stupid system, then once it “clicks”, you feel like the devs were goddamn geniuses for creating a workflow like it.

      And yeah, the polish is nuts considering for a long time and assumption about FOSS was that all the apps are ugly and unpolished.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        then once it “clicks”, you feel like the devs were goddamn geniuses for creating a workflow like it.

        … Unless you have ADHD. What differentiates it is that purely on the surface it looks kinda ADHD-friendly, until you go to that launcher or try to find a setting. That’s better than with KDE (I like KDE, but can’t use it), but worse than just using FVWM or WindowMaker.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I have ADHD. How is it worse? I find window managers interesting in theory but absolutely dreadful in actual use.

          None are even close to feeling usable for anything other than showing off terminal windows

          E: jfc, I obviously meant tiling window managers, since that’s what you were talking about. I’m not advocating for desktops to have literally no ability to manage windows.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            A window manager is part of what you use, unless you run one program in its dedicated X session or don’t use X at all, or use Wayland, in which case you use a Wayland compositor.

            If by “window manager” you mean only standalone window managers that are not part of KDE or Gnome - then just as usable as those that are.

            If you mean that catching someone with a terminal emulator open disqualifies its author as a showoff - many of us actually do use CLI and TUI programs, and for that we need terminal emulators.

            If you think that “window manager” means only tiling WMs from r/unixporn on Reddit - the choice is kinda bigger, there are a few hundreds of them.

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I obviously meant tiling window manager setups, like you described.

              And no I didn’t say using the terminal means you’re a showoff, I have it open all throughout my workday.

              I was saying that TWM setups are poor in terms of usability. The Gnome workflow is perfect for people with ADHD. I can’t really think of anything better.