Spotify is officially raising its Premium subscription rates in the US come July, following reports of the move in April. The platform is increasing its Individual plan from $11 to $12 monthly and its Duo plan from $15 to $17 monthly — the same jump as last year’s $1 and $2 price hikes, respectively. However, its Family plan is going up by a whopping $3, increasing from $17 to $20 monthly. The only subscribers getting a break are students, who will continue to pay $6 monthly.

Spotify announced the price hikes less than a year after its previous one last July. Before that, Spotify hadn’t raised its fees since launching a decade and a half ago. I guess it was too optimistic to hope the next increase would also take that long, especially with Spotify’s continued focus (and money dump) on audiobooks.

Premium subscribers should receive an email from Spotify in the next month detailing the price hike and providing a link to cancel their plan if they would prefer to do so. Users currently on a trial period for Spotify will get one month at $11 after it ends before being moved up to a $12 monthly fee.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Platform agnostic = you own the mp3/FLACC/ect file, and can play it through whatever client you want

        Platform Locked = you do not own the files, and they are DRM locked to their proprietary media player (see: spotify, kindle, ect)

        Of course there are ways around those locks, but it’s illegal to remove DRM protections (in the us)

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          You can switch to another service any time you want though.

                • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  BS. One new CD is at least 10$. A good band collection is then a year worth of subscription fees. So, do you only listen to a few bands?

                  Before Spotify I pirated everything. In lossless, ofc. I had 200GB of music, it wouldn’t fit on my ipod classic, and I still was limited.

                  I pirated at least a lifetime worth of Spotify premium and yet when I switched to Spotify I discovered so many more artists like the ones I already liked. If I now tried to buy all the songs I’ve listened to more than once in the last 5 years, I’d go bankrupt.

                  Spotify is way cheaper.

                  (now add ease of discovering new music, listening to whatever your friends want to listen to in a car, collaborative playlists, etc etc)

  • Lexam@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    It is worth the extra features, like not being able to remove an unwanted podcast from your play list. Why Spotify, why!?

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      As someone else said: it doesn’t replace streaming even a little. Pirating is replacing buying music directly. Streaming facilitates finding new music and trying it out. Being able to listen to anything at any time. You simply can’t do that with downloads; no one can download everything. Piracy in this case really just works for people still listening to their highschool favs and not people looking for new stuff all the time.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Dear lord no. You can still use Spotify, YTM, and a host of other services to discover new music. The argument was valid back in the days of the excellent Google Play Music, but the algorithm has gone to shit since. There are also tons of sources of user curated playlists you can use to fund new music.

        I am 51 and if I let algorithms pick my music I would never discover most of what I find and constantly be fed thirty year old music. Just this past month I discovered mehro, King Woman, Sugar High and Parra for Cuva.

      • veee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        I used to download exclusively when I was younger, but as I get older I’m trying out new genres from different cultures than my own and I’d miss out on it all without a streaming service.

        In my opinion it’s worth it.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Yes and no. It’s more cumbersome for sure but I used to find music on YouTube and all that back in the day then download it.

          • RoosterBoy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            Yes, in fact there are modded versions of the Spotify app (idk about apple) to access their library for free.

            • Neato@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              Do they work like ReVanced Youtube and just remove ads/restrictions while keeping account properties? Or do they work like NewPipe and block all the algorithm stuff, use their own accounts/playlists?

      • SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        It replaces paying for Spotify because its possible to download Spotify premium. Best of both worlds. Use Spotify or YouTube to find stuff, send it to a seedbox, load it later at home.

        Biggest downside is most phones don’t have SD card slots anymore.

        Sent from my (slightly salty) hacked pixel 7

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’m all for pirating, but tbh music streaming apps are a service that is still in the “worth it” range. Not where Spotify is going, but, maintaining a library of high quality music with all the assets, and serving it to all your devices over the Internet is not a small feat to do securely.

      I’ll probably switch to tidal for now while I start building up my library to include stuff beyond what I like…

          • Norgur@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            Since all music services I’ve tried so far are laughably shit at that anyway, Last.fm is your friend. Besides, Plexamp tries to get you into a Tidal subscription and suggests things from there, so you’ll get stuff here nad there.

        • li10@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Done. Until it can’t find a decent quality option for an album you’re searching for.

          A guy I know decided to move away from Spotify and pirate music. The amount of effort he went through means it’s something I’ll probably never try.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            This is the biggest problem for me. I have thousands of movies and 10s of thousands of TV episodes, but my audio library is still all the same stuff I downloaded from Napster, Limewire, Kazaa 20+ years ago. It’s too hard to find a good selection these days outside of a few private trackers. I’m in several private trackers but I’m not going to sit in a queue for 2 days waiting for an interview time and jump through hoops to join something like RED or PTP tier tracker.

            Not to mention I mostly listen to podcasts these days and when I do listen to music, I try to find new stuff that I’ve never heard of rather than searching for a known artist. This would be way too convoluted to do on my own with some self-hosted solution.

            • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              I’ve been using deemix, and for the most part it’s been pretty seamless. Stuff direct downloads instantly, but it’s all in 128kbps now unfortunately. Then I have lidarr monitor everything for a lossless version.

              • DjMeas@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                27 days ago

                Are you saying Deemix only downloads at 128kbps? If so, I’ve been using it as well and download in FLAC. Also, I pay for the family plan which is $15.99/month.

                Edit: Ah, I’m guessing you’re not on a paid Deezer plan.

                • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  Yeah I’m on the free plan which used to include FLAC and 320kpbs, but they stopped doing that for free plans about a year ago I think.

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Just some perspective: I’ve been self-hosting stuff for 7y now, started with plex on a nas. I have tried a couple times to get the *arr stack working, one at a time and fuck me it’s complex and the risk of fucking up the config and data crossing the clearnet without a VPN, noooope fuck right off with that. That risk/reward just is too skewed for me.

      • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        You should check out Plexamp while you bridge the gap. It has tidal support built in, and you can self-host your own collection as you build it up. Then when you’re done with tidal, you don’t have to learn or download a new app.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I use a cracked Spotify client but if I do legitimately pay, it will be for Tidal. I want that sweet sweet lossless audio people have been talking about.

  • 3aqn5k6ryk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Then the rest follow. If Apple music hike their price again, time to dust off my eye patch. Ive already cancelled all my streaming and went with plex, radarr, sonarr.

      • 3aqn5k6ryk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Music streaming the only one i cant be bothered with since i have family plan with my gf plus discovering new music and new album from fav artist is too much to pass on.

    • Norgur@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Life hack: get Plexamp and Lidarr with Lidarr extended scripts. Then sign up for a free month of tidal with a throwaway account. Add said account to Lidarr extended. Add all the artists you want to Lidarr and let Lidarr Extended download all the stuff from Tidal for you. Once it has run out, register with another throwaway adress.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Does this work with any other services like spotify? I know Tidal is lossless but I already have Spotify and Lidarr.

        • Norgur@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          No, it works on Tidal and Deezer. Yet, since the throwaway account is free… :P Lidarr can import spotify playlists and fetch the tracks themselves from somewhere else though

      • 3aqn5k6ryk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Thanks mate. Will definitely look at lidar. Maybe its time, some music like doom eternal arent available in apple music and this might push me.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Basically doing this already but my only issue is discovery. That’s why I pay for Spotify. I used to have a script set up before the API closed that would run automatically monthly to snag all my liked songs.

        • Norgur@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          There are cool projects for that on lidarr, or you use things like last.fm. Lidarr extended does have a feature to grab similar artists to the ones you have, leads to much bloat in a very short amount of time, of course.

  • Magzmak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I wish they allowed more audiobook time per month, so one could finish a book past 11hrs. I’d be fine with an extra buck or two for a combined audiobook/music streaming service.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Just your local library for Libby or other electronic access. You probably have access to borrow audiobooks online for free. (assuming the US)

      • militant_spider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Unfortunately, Spotify has it set where there doesn’t appear to be a limitation on how many people can listen at once, whereas Libby still only has so many copies to share.

    • impure9435@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Apple Music only raised the price by $1 since the launch in 2015 (9 years ago). But they added cool features like lossless audio quality and Dolby Atmos. They also had lyrics like 6 years before Spotify added them. I think you can even get it for $6 dollars if you’re a student.

        • GenEcon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          How does this work? Spotify has a deal with the music publishers, where they give 70 % of all subscription income to the music companies. The music companies (Sony, Warner, etc) then split the money based on the share of streams.

          How can Apple pay out 2.5x70 %, so 175 %? Are thes losing with every subscription?

          • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            Think of it not in terms of revenue percentages, but by payouts per song stream:

            Service Payout/song Plays to make $1
            Tidal Music $0.01284 78
            Apple Music $0.008 125
            Amazon Music $0.00402 249
            Spotify $0.00318 314
            YouTube Music $0.002 500
            Pandora $0.00133 752
            Deezer $0.0011 909

            So song for song, Apple is paying 2.5x what Spotify is (.008/.00318), and Tidal is paying out a whopping 4x what Spotify pays.

            Sauce: https://producerhive.com/music-marketing-tips/streaming-royalties-breakdown/

            • GenEcon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              That whole article is BS, they even say it themselves:

              Rates are rarely paid at a flat rate per stream

              There is no payout per stream. Instead a fixed percentage of the subscription price is shared among each streamed song. So why does Tidal pay more then? Either their subscriber numbers are still incorrect (they have a history of publishing way higher numbers than in reality), their subscriber listen to less music (which is the main reason Apple Music pays more per stream on paper, since its often bundled) or their audience focuses more on a single artist (or a genre).

              • PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                26 days ago

                Sure. Obviously it’s more complex than that, but it helps illustrate where the math came from in the parent comment. I don’t know why Tidal pays more, but I’m hypothesizing its because most of their “co-owners” of Tidal are themselves, artists/musicians, which IMO is significantly better than the out of touch folks running Spotify.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I feel they’re all fairly similar. I won’t do apple music because I don’t do iOS, and I moved from Google play music when forced to the inferior YouTube music. I wonder if tidal or any other service has comparable pricing.

      • Dasnap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        I use YT Music because I get it cheap (VPN shenanigans), you can upload your own music (hello Nintendo soundtracks), and I mod the Android app to stop it being a mess (ReVanced Extended is the GOAT).

        • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Do you always have to have the VPN connected to get the cheaper rate?

          • Dasnap@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            Nah just when I bought it. I did this a while ago so I’m not sure if it still works.

            I’m gonna cling onto the quid a month rate for dear life.

      • impure9435@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        I’ve been using Apple Music on Android for years, I definitely recommend it. The app is totally fine, I think it’s still better than Spotify’s crappy app. On desktop you can use the Cider app, which is much better than iTunes. It’s even available on Linux.

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          I switched to AM a couple years ago due to the (better) privacy policy vs YTM. The app is ‘fine’ but it’s painfully obvious that they didn’t want to bother with the android UI guidelines. But it’s a small annoyance, and the price is… palatable, I guess? I think I’d jump ship at $14, but at $12, fine. I don’t use it that much.

          Actually, it’d be nice if they would charge based on usage, not flat-rate. I doubt I’m using $3 of that $12 cost.

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Tidal is $11/mo for an individual and $17 for a 6 person family plan. I recently switched because they supposedly give a better cut to artists and serve flac files.

      • li10@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        £2 a month for a HiFi subscription if you use a Nigerian VPN.

        • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          So if you use a VPN to sign up, then disconnect the VPN, does it block you? Or do you always need to be on VPN?

          • li10@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            You don’t need to be connected on the VPN to use it, I find it identical to my previous UK subscription.

            Only difference is that your initial recommendations are for Nigerian music 😆 Those disappear quite quickly after you start listening to music you like tho.

      • Norgur@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Yeah. Never thought I’d see the day when Tidal was cheaper than crappy Spotify.

        • dinckel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          If i wasn’t paying for a family play on Spotify, I would have resorted to music piracy at this point. The quality is still garbage, the service is getting worse, but the prices are only going up every half a year

          • variants@possumpat.io
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            27 days ago

            I tried sourcing my own music but man it’s a lot harder than movies and shows. Especially when you like to hear random recommended music how do you get enough

            • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              Yeah - credit where it’s due, Spotify did a really good job with their music recommendation engine. It’s just that recently, they’ve started to get into the sad part of the enshittification cycle. I kinda saw the writing on the wall when they started forcing Joe Rogan podcast promos fucking everywhere, without having a config anywhere to disable podcast suggestions (which I don’t use through Spotify)

              • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                27 days ago

                I’m surprised you’re only getting these now. My recommendations have been mostly garbage for the better part of a decade so all this praise for finding new music confuses me a little. Spotify has many feats, but the algorithm never was one for me, quite the opposite. I find it more annoying than helpful, actually.

                • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  My beginning (about 6 years ago) was fine. Still miss the radio feature though.
                  They kinda brought it back but in a reverse form (former: 4 new 1 old, now: 5 old 1 new).
                  Playlist shuffle is atrocious but I am not picking them better any better.

            • dinckel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              27 days ago

              Feel you there. A lot of what i listen to are brand new bands, and finding sources for those is rough

    • cas919@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I use Apple Music, primarily because I need to pay for the higher tiers iCloud storage for my wife’s photo addiction and it’s basically “free” for the family plan.

      If I didn’t already have the higher tier iCloud, I would probably prefer tidal for higher quality, or Spotify for the more diverse library.

  • Caesium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I gotta start direct downloading my music again soon. Spotify has just left me feeling so frustrated lately.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’ve emailed support thrice for intrusive full screen ads. “these are promotions”. Yeah, ads… “Sorry you don’t like our promotions, we will note it”

      Uh huh.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    The problem is that creators aren’t getting paid their fair share, and these platforms leech off of their creativity. I hate to be “that guy”, but this is where NFTs actually have a use case. Give power directly to the creators of their music by allowing them sell directly to fans. This gives power to the creators and to the listeners who own the NFT. Embracing new technology is a way to break beyond corporate enshittification. We must break past “you will own nothing and be happy” and it seems like blockchain is one of the only ways to do it technologically.

    • mxcory@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Why not just use Bandcamp? Even with nfts someone has to maintain the CDN. Alternatively, run your own site.

      • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Because then they wouldn’t be able to evangelize NFTs. You see this constantly with crypto/NFT tech, a solution in search of a problem

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Blockchain is used for Xbox royalties.

          The problem is that legacy rights holder (the middlemen) have no incentive to use blockchain to cut themselves out. They have the legal high ground and are not going to give it up.

          • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            Right, and blockchain/NFT have nothing to do with that problem. Xbox could have implemented the exact same program without a blockchain, they just wanted the buzzword in the headline.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              “By implementing a blockchain-based network and streamlined royalty processing, game publishers and Xbox benefit from a more trusted, transparent and connected system from contract creation through to royalty settlements”

              Trust is the key ingredient added by blockchain. Traditional databases couldn’t be trusted to be honest.

              • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                24 days ago

                If a game developer can’t trust the platform you’re developing for, you probably should look to find better business partners.

    • DinkleDorph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      People have a negative image of NFTs because of the speculation and early (crappy) implementations of the technology. It’s just a technology. I think web3 will be the answer to a lot of the corporate enshittification issues we see today. Community owned and operated networks and organizations are the future.

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    More money More crap nobody wants like audio books Still haven’t seen cd quality streaming yet

    I used to happy with Spotify before the enshitificatuon happened…

      • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        I got Tidal for a month to try it out because I had gotten some XM4s and wanted to check out the 360 Reality Audio tracks, and I was disappointed to find just how few of them there actually are. 😕

        Edit: I see not that they did away with that ultra premium tier and folded those 360 Reality Audio tracks into the regular plans…they really did make it cheaper. Looks like I’m switching back to Tidal.

      • Manalith@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        I have used Spotify’s 15 free hours a month for shorter light novels, but beyond that, buying the rights to listen to a book, or buying more listening hours is very much not worth it through them.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      What is this? I can’t find a description anywhere on GitHub of what this is

      • murmelade@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Removes ads with the free accounts. You will be limited to free sound quality and other premium features are missing but ya know, good enough for free without ads.

      • Zidane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        The android app for sure gets rid of ads. I just use browser + adblock for PC so unsure there

        • murmelade@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Yes the PC one has adblock and you can re-skin and use widgets from their marketplace (free)

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’ll add the old school method of scrobbling to last.fm for discovery still works pretty well too, and you can play music directly there now using Youtube (probably been there for years I assume). Just found some pretty obscure stuff that isn’t even available on the mainstream streaming services, so that’s a win.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        I forgot last.fm existed. I sort of used them years ago.

        They did not handle separate artists with the same name gracefully at all. The page for a riot-grrl adjacent band and an Australian rapper (?) got merged and the fans were going at it on the page.

        Looks like it’s still kind of a problem