Also, interesting comment I found on HackerNews (HN):

This post was definitely demoted by HN. It stayed in the first position for less than 5 minutes and, as it quickly gathered upvotes, it jumped straight into 24th and quickly fell off the first page as it got 200 or so more points in less than an hour.

I’m 80% confident HN tried to hide this link. It’s the fastest downhill I’ve noticed on here, and I’ve been lurking and commenting for longer than 10 years.

  • fartington@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Now admittedly, $250 is probably fairly low for the amount of traffic we were pushing through Cloudflare.

    Lmao do you expect CF to continue taking losses from your $250/month plan?

    Edit: Downvote all you want. This guy probably ignored emails about the volume he was sending so they used shady tactics to get him to respond. $3k a year from this client is not a big loss. You ask 40 customers to pay $120k you only need 1 to cover losing the other 39.

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I didn’t see anyone saying that but the correct response is: in the next billing cycle we’re going to start charging X amount per month for X amount of traffic or we have to bump you to to the next tier.

      If things are so dire that the traffic is causing problems the correct response is to throttle certain domain traffic until it gets figured out in some way.

      Pay X amount in 24 hours or we remove you entirely is extortion.