• force@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Man Biden is really trying to lose the upcoming election isn’t he. A year ago I would not have predicted that he would fuck up such an easy reelection this badly, but here we are. Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory I guess.

    Apparently Biden has always been this shitty when it comes to Palestine. Some things children just never grow out of it seems.

    • alley cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Millions of children never grew old because of Kissingers little psychopathic padawans in Washington for decades now. Those children don’t care about this one losing or winning his little beauty contest.

      And millions of children will die in the future no matter whose dick is being sucked in the Oval Office. There are more omnipotent deciders who decide who lives and who dies.

      This greedy, bloodthirsty, manipulative, sociopathic voting won’t change anything no matter who wins.

    • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Don’t you know Trump is gonna genocide harder? Some shitlib told me yesterday trump will conduct a real genocide, as if the one happening in front of our eyes is fake

      • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Are you talking about the Trump that won’t quit talking about how antisemitic Biden has been in the Gaza genocide?

        https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/09/us/politics/trump-biden-jews.html

        Imagine seeing someone yell at a rapist in the middle of raping that they aren’t raping viciously enough and then thinking that it would be good to send that guy in there instead. I agree, no rape would be best, but I’m pretty sure the victim in this case would prefer the current rapist over the one complaining about how the current rapist is being offensively gentle.

        • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Beyond your disgusting analogy, if you think Palestinians give a shit who sends the bombs to Israel that are going to kill them you’re not living in reality.

          Tell me you’re voting for Biden on domestic policy grounds, and I’ll agree with you because that’s my plan, but stop dressing this up as anything that’s not as bad as it could be

          • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Do you realize that if today the casualties on both sides of Gaza and isreal since October happened again, and then every day that many more is added, let’s say 40,000 per day. If we continue doing that every single day, we wouldn’t reach the world war 2 casualties until 2027. So yes, things can, and have very recently been much worse.

            Biden is a bastard, he is blowing up gazan children daily, and I hope the universe makes a special exception for him and creates a biblical hell. Trump calls this “level of restraint” antisemitic. Trump is in extreme debt, angry as hell, and he has a bunch of racist anti-muslim fanatics he’s trying to please. He can absolutely make things worse.

              • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Are you seriously a Trump supporter because you think the conservatives will be kinder to a group of minority Muslims that are up against Jewish Israel? Is this the first time you’ve ever paid attention to American politics?

                Look up what a president by the name of George Bush Jr. did to the Middle East, you’re about to have your political views dumped completely upside-down. The Republicans are not nearly as buddy-buddy with Islamic minorities as you’ve somehow been lead to believe.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you’re going to define your movement as anti-genocidal you should really have a firm grasp on what genocide is and who is committing it:

        Article II of the Convention defines genocide as:
        … any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

        • (a) Killing members of the group;
        • (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
        • © Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
        • (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
        • (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

        Hamas, what Israel has been clear they intend to destroy, is not a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. However, Jews/Israel/Israelis, what Hamas has been clear they intend to destroy, are. Therefore, legally Oct 7 was an act of genocide, and Israel’s war on Hamas is not. Such a designation has nothing to do with body count.

        I support Israel because I oppose the genocidal. Binding their hands and preventing them from retaliating in self-defense only serves to support genocidal Hamas by keeping them in power.

        • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Take your hasbara bullshit somewhere else. According to that same organization you took your definition from, an occupying nation like Israel can not claim self defense when attacked

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sorry to invade your echo chamber with dissent. It must pain you to be reminded that not everyone agrees with you, that must be so hard for you.

            an occupying nation like Israel can not claim self defense when attacked

            Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005. A blockade is not an occupation.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Say what?

              New York (20 October 2022) – There are reasonable grounds to conclude that the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory is now unlawful under international law due to its permanence and the Israeli Government’s de-facto annexation policies, according to the first report to the General Assembly issued today by the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel.

              Oh, I forgor, the United Nations is Hamas now.

        • Kben@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You support Israel because you oppose the genocidal.This is one of the most batshit insane things i have read on this site,you really cannot have typed that with a straight face.

        • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          “Look at me displacing almost 2 million people and bombing their homes and cities whole to the ground one by one. It’s not a genocide though, because I haven’t explicitely claimed that my goal is to commit a genocide.”

                • can@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  When it’s targeted at a specific group of people and there’s such a dramatic power imbalance, yes. Whether modern definitions agree or not.

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              When entire civilian populations are bombed or starved, then yes. The US is not free of war crimes. They’re merely immune from the consequences.

              • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Not just the US. Chechnya was invaded by Russia. German civilians were bombed by the UK and USSR.

                In fact, it’s hard to find a large-scale modern war that didn’t cause thousands of civilian casualties.

                • Pennomi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Absolutely, there were millions of civilian casualties in WWII. The difference here is that there have been, according to Israel, only 273 soldiers killed in ground operation combat vs the 13,000 civilians killed on Gaza’s side. (According to the new, lower estimates.) This is not so much a war as a one-sided beatdown.

          • juicy@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The thing is, Israel’s leaders have expressed genocidal intent over and over again. Just read South Africa’s allegations at the ICJ. They have the receipts.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s almost as if words mean things and have specific definitions, especially legal ones. Feel free to criticize such behaviors with different accurate words for things you don’t like.

              • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                If someone punches you to death, declaring they weren’t trying to kill you doesn’t make them any less guilty of murder.

                Actually, in the US it could. Intent is the difference between murder and manslaughter.

                • Aceticon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Curious how you moved the goal posts from “not openly stating one’s intent” which was used as justification to claim what Israel is doing is not a Genocide to “not having intent” which is what defines the difference between murder and manslaught.

                  People are convicted of murder all the time when they didn’t openly said their intention was murder if it can be shown beyond reasonable doubt that it was their intention.

                  So the previous poster’s point holds very well and you just further dug the grave on yours.

                • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  On the other hand, genocide was committed in October, when Hamas brutally attacked the Jewish state, murdering an estimated 1,200 people, Schiff said.

                  …and the article lost credibility. If what Israel is doing isn’t genocide, then what Hamas did can’t be genocide.

                  Looked up the people quoted in the article. Rabbi Danny Schiff is an ethics lawyer from Pittsburgh, not a genocide scholar. Avi Ben-Hur, who is more qualified to speak on this said:

                  “We have a monster on our doorstep,” he said. “We were caught asleep. We had horrible things done to us. It’s not a question of payback. We have to retrieve our safety and security so people can go back to their homes and live their lives like normal people. We have to degrade the monster’s offensive capabilities so this can’t happen again.” source.

                  Calling them “monsters,” and dehumanizing people, doesn’t gain my trust.