He’s gonna light his own ass up and she is just going to sit silently while he screams like a little boy.

I’m more worried about their misinformation and meddling.

Dumb people being influenced by misinformation designed to crush the west.

They don’t.

Until there is a hard kill switch for the cellular connection, they can’t claim to not be scummy

Notice how the article title doesn’t use his name to protect his brand for a future presidential run

I agree completely with you that Snapchat is an unmonitored disaster that gives the user the impression that the person they are sharing their nudes with cannot save the content. A good portion of the videos on porn sites have that little Snapchat progress wheel on them and are clearly screencaps.

Aside: I think there is a big topic that conveniently gets overlooked because it’s so much easier to blame “social media” or the “predator,” and that is—where are the fucking parents?

I think for me it is because my background is in the web first, as opposed to having gone to school for general computer science and then entered web apps second. The idea of returning blocks of HTML with JSX makes more sense to them.

Mixing js and template like react does with jsx has always rubbed me wrong. I like how Vue separates everything.

{!found && <p>Not Found</p>} 😕

<p v-if=“!found”>Not Found</p> 🙂

My heart belongs to Vue.js

Boeing killed John Barnett

Yeah. But you know how it is here, you’re either against it or you’re one of them. Make a logical comparison between two nearly identical things and you’re whatabouting. I appreciate you recognizing the difference.

I definitely don’t want to sound as if I’m promoting this material, but I agree. Fake things are fake and real things are real. Yeah, it makes a lot of people uncomfortable to think about it and I totally understand.

Fake images of murder seem to be perfectly fine! And that’s arguably the worst crime possible. We show that shit to our kids.

That’s awesome. I don’t have that patience. 😇

iOS 17.4 is able to side load apps in the EU as of early this year. But everywhere else no.

The last paragraph is the big issue. Fix society. We can argue all day long about what line does “artwork” cross before it becomes illegal, but that’s not actually preventing anyone from getting abused.

And imo, it seems a little sick to say, “we made a bunch of kiddie porn that didn’t exist previously, and I’m going to distribute it to catch criminals—using tax dollars” … tf?

Yeah don’t Google it hahaha

It what makes it a child? There’s some creepy anime girls who definitely fall into that questionable category. And if I label a stick figure with an age… does that make it illegal? What about an ai image with bubble text that says “I’m not real. I’m 18, I have a magical curse on me etc etc” now it’s fiction?

Since it isn’t actually real… what is the line, and how can that line be measured? Since this is just going to keep being a problem, this awkward conversation needs to happen in a logical, calm manner.

I provide places with my name misspelled all the time. That’s misrepresenting, but not a crime.

A billion dollar company got played. Change the code and pay out the money. Are they going to refund advertisers? Doubt it.

But now they can argue that they aren’t sexually attracted to children, just AI artwork, which is technically not an image of a child. And unless I missed it, they were not trying to meet the girl.

The problem is going to be that images that aren’t real of a crime aren’t a crime. Of the opposite was true, images of murder would be illegal. Can’t just cherry pick.

If I draw a stick figure and label it “naked girl,” does it become child porn? What if I’m a really good artist?

Now that is a furry outfit.